Not same, similarrockstah wrote:http://www.jj-electronic.sk/index.php?o ... &Itemid=11
wht do you guYS make of this? it appears that the E34L and the EL34 are tHE same frickin tube?
"JJEL34 is a lower output tube like a JJE34L"
Sub
Moderators: VelvetGeorge, RACKSYSTEMS
Not same, similarrockstah wrote:http://www.jj-electronic.sk/index.php?o ... &Itemid=11
wht do you guYS make of this? it appears that the E34L and the EL34 are tHE same frickin tube?
very kewl! very interesting info there and thanks for pointing me toTerry!:) isnt that what a bias pot does anyway? it matches or not the two groups of two tubes - so what would two bias pots do?5150loveeddie wrote:Man, Terry introduced me to the old glass and from the very fisrt time I completly flipped on them.........no more modern crap for me, well maybe those Tung Sol 12ax7s.......
One other thing, for the power section if your gonna go with xf2,3 or 4s....a little unmached is WAY better soundind then perfectly matched quads, I do beleive that now, it will increase your even order harmonics....and the tubes are just magical, NOW the unmatched should not be more then 6-8ma on one tube only, just enough to create a "little" unbalance from one side to the other (max it at 10ma, more then that and one side of your primary will start to get hot......and the low ends could become a little muddy some say....), ask Terry about that!!!! I've done it and gave him shit the first time because he send me a quad with one tube 8ma off and he said just play your amp, do you like it? I said yeah, so he said ok I'll send you an other tube closer 2-3ma then try it, so I waited for the tube and did it, and to my surprise, the tone was more sterile not as much "magical". See.. As long the transconductance is ok between them a little 7-8 ma on one tube is better.....just my 2 cents..
Dan, now thats what im talking about! that rocks!Billy Batz wrote:Yeah I totally agree about unmatching. I would be fine as long as the lowest and highest differ by less then 10mA. One of the reasons Im using a dual bias in my newest clone is to be able to unmatch or match as closely as I want.
Cool Dan, you gonna show that little mod up I hope ?Billy Batz wrote:Yeah I totally agree about unmatching. I would be fine as long as the lowest and highest differ by less then 10mA. One of the reasons Im using a dual bias in my newest clone is to be able to unmatch or match as closely as I want.
It controls all four tubes so you can't do anything to play with the matching, it all depends on what the tubes will give you, but with two trim pots (like Dan's...) you could control each side like you want!!!!!rockstah wrote:very kewl! very interesting info there and thanks for pointing me toTerry!:) isnt that what a bias pot does anyway? it matches or not the two groups of two tubes - so what would two bias pots do?5150loveeddie wrote:Man, Terry introduced me to the old glass and from the very fisrt time I completly flipped on them.........no more modern crap for me, well maybe those Tung Sol 12ax7s.......
One other thing, for the power section if your gonna go with xf2,3 or 4s....a little unmached is WAY better soundind then perfectly matched quads, I do beleive that now, it will increase your even order harmonics....and the tubes are just magical, NOW the unmatched should not be more then 6-8ma on one tube only, just enough to create a "little" unbalance from one side to the other (max it at 10ma, more then that and one side of your primary will start to get hot......and the low ends could become a little muddy some say....), ask Terry about that!!!! I've done it and gave him shit the first time because he send me a quad with one tube 8ma off and he said just play your amp, do you like it? I said yeah, so he said ok I'll send you an other tube closer 2-3ma then try it, so I waited for the tube and did it, and to my surprise, the tone was more sterile not as much "magical". See.. As long the transconductance is ok between them a little 7-8 ma on one tube is better.....just my 2 cents..