50 watt problems
Moderator: VelvetGeorge
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1839
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:30 am
- Location: Warren, Mi
50 watt problems
I just put a board in a '76 1987, and new filter caps, and while I was at it I redid the heater wires cause they were green and orange from the factory! The horror! So at that point I decided to replace the tube sockets as well, and everything went fine, put in the new metro board, and tried to fire it up, and Im getting no sound at all.
Have 396 on the plates biased at 65% max diss, and I got some real screwy voltages on v-3. I used the 100 watt voltage chart as a general reference, and v-1 and v-2 both looked good on all pins.
here's v-3:
pin1 = 284 vdc
2 = 126
3 = 250
4 = 3.0 ac
5 = 3.0 ac
6 = 280
7 = 125
8 = 250
9 = 3.0 ac
Some crazy high numbers there, and when measuring the pins one and six, I was getting a noise out of the speaker, and a buzz when measuring the cathode(s).
Here's some pics, any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks!
Have 396 on the plates biased at 65% max diss, and I got some real screwy voltages on v-3. I used the 100 watt voltage chart as a general reference, and v-1 and v-2 both looked good on all pins.
here's v-3:
pin1 = 284 vdc
2 = 126
3 = 250
4 = 3.0 ac
5 = 3.0 ac
6 = 280
7 = 125
8 = 250
9 = 3.0 ac
Some crazy high numbers there, and when measuring the pins one and six, I was getting a noise out of the speaker, and a buzz when measuring the cathode(s).
Here's some pics, any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:24 am
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: MI
- Contact:
Your presence pot has no connection to ground (through the cap alone no good). The pot, or resistor sometimes slapped across it serves as the end of the PI tail there, so the PI needs that to work right. Typically in later amps like yours it'd be as you have it, but a 4.7K resistor is needed across the pot (from purple wire lug to ground, pot being a 22K usually).
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1839
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:30 am
- Location: Warren, Mi
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1839
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:30 am
- Location: Warren, Mi
- Flames1950
- Senior Member
- Posts: 9294
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:04 am
- Location: Waukee, Iowa
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1839
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:30 am
- Location: Warren, Mi
Wow, coming from you, Steve should really take that as a compliment!!Flames1950 wrote:Steve's eyes are sharp as a tack......I'd never have seen that from the posted pics!!!!
This amp screams, wow. Very "rip your face off" aggressive! I'm thinking about removing the .68 cap over the 820 ohm cathode resistor, just to hear the difference.
What year did Marshall add that cap? Just curious.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:24 am
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: MI
- Contact:
- neikeel
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7231
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:31 am
- Location: Suffolk, England
Seems to disappear on the 50 watters about the switch to PCB (late '73-'74), along with 100k onto 4ohm NFB change and the 0.68uF/25k/27k on the presence pot, not sure about 100watters, probably a bit earlier as I have seen quite a few 71-73 superleads without it.OnTheFritz wrote:Wow, coming from you, Steve should really take that as a compliment!!Flames1950 wrote:Steve's eyes are sharp as a tack......I'd never have seen that from the posted pics!!!!
This amp screams, wow. Very "rip your face off" aggressive! I'm thinking about removing the .68 cap over the 820 ohm cathode resistor, just to hear the difference.
What year did Marshall add that cap? Just curious.
Neil