clean headroom?

Get support and show off your MetroAmp 50 Watt kit builds.

Moderator: VelvetGeorge

Post Reply
huntermj
New Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 4:54 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7

clean headroom?

Post by huntermj » Mon May 25, 2009 10:47 am

My apologies for the rather newbie-ish question, but I did make an honest attempt at searching through all 11 pages of posts for an answer to no real avail. (Honestly I did!) Anyhow - I'm leaning towards getting one of the 50-watt kits, and was wondering if current owners could comment on the amount of clean headroom one could expect to get before clipping. If I were to go this route, I'd most likely also purchase the LarMar MV kit and some sort of attenuator to get the rock at more reasonable volume levels but I'd also like to make sure I have some amount of clean power too. Thanks in advance for the replies, or feel free to call me a dumb*ss and point me towards a relevant post I might have missed. :D

Mike Hunter

User avatar
novosibir
Senior Member
Posts: 4654
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:32 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Nuernberg, Germany
Contact:

Re: clean headroom?

Post by novosibir » Mon May 25, 2009 2:27 pm

huntermj wrote:... I did make an honest attempt at searching through all 11 pages of posts for an answer to no real avail.
What topic?
huntermj wrote:... or feel free to call me a dumb*ss and point me towards a relevant post I might have missed. :D
Nobody is entitled, to offend anybody else here.

Larry
The fault almost always is sitting in front of the amp :wink:

Larry's Website now with included Pix's Gallery

User avatar
mwm523
Senior Member
Posts: 521
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:25 am
Location: Northern NJ

Re: clean headroom?

Post by mwm523 » Mon May 25, 2009 10:19 pm

I wouldn't say the 50 watters are known for their clean headroom. A stock 1987 lead circuit is a gainy beast... The one I built starts to crunch at about 3 on the bright channel volume.

You can get more headroom by using smaller bright cap (or none at all), playing around with negative feedback, and changing the amp to be closer to bass specs, but I still don't think you'll get a ton of headroom out of it.
-Mike

User avatar
908ssp
Senior Member
Posts: 2954
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 12:56 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Michigan
Contact:

Re: clean headroom?

Post by 908ssp » Tue May 26, 2009 9:52 am

Yes the 50 has plenty of good cleans and semi cleans. Just turn your guitar volume knob down. Seems terribly hard to get people to use the guitars volume knob turn it down and the amp cleans right up loud and proud and clean. The few amps that don't clean up well with the volume are ones with added gain stages where the gain is dictated by the gain between stages. Old Marshall style amps generally don't have that problem. I run my amp on 9.5 and turn the guitar volume down for the best and cleanest cleans.

Roe
Senior Member
Posts: 5054
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 1:36 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Drontheim. Norwegen
Contact:

Re: clean headroom?

Post by Roe » Tue May 26, 2009 10:39 am

removing the .68uf cap on v2a results in an amp that cleans up better IMO
http://www.myspace.com/20bonesband" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.myspace.com/prostitutes" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Super 100 amps: 1202-119 & 1202-84
JTM45 RS OT JTM50 JMP50 1959/2203/34/39

User avatar
Frankie Sixxxgun
Senior Member
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 8:33 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Tampa Bay
Contact:

Re: clean headroom?

Post by Frankie Sixxxgun » Tue May 26, 2009 10:53 am

My 50 watter gets plenty clean if I roll the volume on the guitar down. Best clean tone I've ever heard comes out of my 50 watt Metro head with my White Falcon in the neck position and the volume rolled back a bit.

huntermj
New Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 4:54 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7

Re: clean headroom?

Post by huntermj » Tue May 26, 2009 10:55 pm

Again, many thanks for everyone's responses! I'm a bit torn as to whether to the 50-watt or the JTM45 route, so feedback like this is quite helpful.

User avatar
mwm523
Senior Member
Posts: 521
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:25 am
Location: Northern NJ

Re: clean headroom?

Post by mwm523 » Tue May 26, 2009 10:57 pm

You'd probably get a "nicer" clean sound out of a JTM45, but you'll get a lot more overall volume from a 50 watt.
-Mike

Twistingcrow
Senior Member
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 8:48 am

Re: clean headroom?

Post by Twistingcrow » Sun Feb 03, 2013 4:47 pm

Roe wrote:removing the .68uf cap on v2a results in an amp that cleans up better IMO
And what would you replace it with Roe? Another value or nothing?
Thanks!

Roe
Senior Member
Posts: 5054
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 1:36 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Drontheim. Norwegen
Contact:

Re: clean headroom?

Post by Roe » Mon Feb 04, 2013 3:50 am

Twistingcrow wrote:
Roe wrote:removing the .68uf cap on v2a results in an amp that cleans up better IMO
And what would you replace it with Roe? Another value or nothing?
Thanks!
nothing, cf. the jtm/bass schematics
http://www.myspace.com/20bonesband" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.myspace.com/prostitutes" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Super 100 amps: 1202-119 & 1202-84
JTM45 RS OT JTM50 JMP50 1959/2203/34/39

Twistingcrow
Senior Member
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 8:48 am

Re: clean headroom?

Post by Twistingcrow » Mon Feb 04, 2013 9:43 am

Awesome, gonna try this for my tonight rehearsal... :wink:

Post Reply