Amp layouts, courtesy of BillyBatz

Moderator: VelvetGeorge

Post Reply
Billy Batz
Senior Member
Posts: 8566
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 8:49 pm

Post by Billy Batz » Wed Jan 25, 2006 6:18 pm

By request and altered version of the JTM-100 layotu is up with the Dickinson Hendrix amp specs.

User avatar
sub
Senior Member
Posts: 636
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 8:53 pm
Location: Hungary (Europe)

Post by sub » Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:31 pm

8)
GibsonMarshallCelestion

User avatar
rockstah
Senior Member
Posts: 12481
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 12:28 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Austin Texas

Post by rockstah » Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:34 pm

Dan kicks ass! :)

User avatar
sub
Senior Member
Posts: 636
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 8:53 pm
Location: Hungary (Europe)

Post by sub » Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:37 pm

rockstah wrote:Dan kicks ass! :)
Absolutely!
GibsonMarshallCelestion

User avatar
novosibir
Senior Member
Posts: 4626
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:32 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Nuernberg, Germany
Contact:

Post by novosibir » Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:39 pm

Billy Batz wrote:By request and altered version of the JTM-100 layotu is up with the Dickinson Hendrix amp specs.
Here see my request please 8)

Larry
The fault almost always is sitting in front of the amp :wink:

Larry's Website now with included Pix's Gallery

Billy Batz
Senior Member
Posts: 8566
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 8:49 pm

Post by Billy Batz » Wed Jan 25, 2006 8:04 pm

Did I actually say 'by request'? What am I a damn DJ?

What was that Larry :)

BTW- I didnt get involved in all the discussions and rumors about the Dickinson amp on PP and other forums. The authenticity of the tone stack values is still a question correct? If so it seems to me 33k/500p probably werent stock. Maybe it was a mistake by the owner. It just seems weird. Were there any other 66 KT66 amps that had those later values? Not just that but it also seems that since it is known that they were replaced why the hell else would you ever change the slope and treble cap other then to mod the values? Unless what the claim is is actually that it was changed out while Hendrix owned the amp?
Last edited by Billy Batz on Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
rockstah
Senior Member
Posts: 12481
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 12:28 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Austin Texas

Post by rockstah » Wed Jan 25, 2006 8:08 pm

DJ Dan! it has a ring to it :P

User avatar
MacGaden
Wiki Editor
Posts: 2189
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 5:57 am
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Fredericia, Denmark

Post by MacGaden » Thu Jan 26, 2006 3:45 am

I was the requester...

DJ Dan ?

I like Lieutenant Dan better:


Image


That look anything like you ?

:D !
MacG.

"Play it right, Dad ! No More Dwiddely Dwiddely !
My son Adam at 3 years old. Best advice I ever got..

User avatar
rockstah
Senior Member
Posts: 12481
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 12:28 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Austin Texas

Post by rockstah » Thu Jan 26, 2006 4:00 am

:lol: hilarious!!! :lol:

Brooks Reid
New Member
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 9:47 pm

Post by Brooks Reid » Thu Jan 26, 2006 8:54 am

Fantasic job. Exactly what I was looking for. I am an aspiring Marshall affectionado and I was looking for something that showed the layout and the connections. I still haven't quite mastered schematics as of yet.
Thanks again!

Billy Batz
Senior Member
Posts: 8566
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 8:49 pm

Post by Billy Batz » Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:41 am

MacGaden wrote:I was the requester...

DJ Dan ?

I like Lieutenant Dan better:

That look anything like you ?

:D !
Only from the waist down.

User avatar
neikeel
Senior Member
Posts: 7076
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Suffolk, England

Post by neikeel » Fri Jan 27, 2006 1:44 pm

Brilliant diagrams, had not seen them before, I presumed they were the ones on Georges CD.

Including the JTM45-100 ones is really helpful

Thanks a lot :D
Neil

Billy Batz
Senior Member
Posts: 8566
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 8:49 pm

Post by Billy Batz » Fri Jan 27, 2006 2:08 pm

These are up to date. There are little inconsistencies with the CD layouts. Their basically correct though. No real mistakes. If you read the first reply you can see everything Ive fixed or added to the layotus since being put up which means anythign listed there will still be a problem on the CD layout.

Hey George. If you read this and your not too busy, if you still include the layouts on the CD maybe you can replace them with the updated versions here.

User avatar
wdelaney72
Senior Member
Posts: 1596
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:04 pm
Location: Chicago Suburbs

Post by wdelaney72 » Mon Jan 30, 2006 3:13 pm

Billy Batz:

Thank you for posting such informative and precise layouts. They've been a huge help.

I had a guestion about a few of the component values by the rectifier diodes. It appears that there are 2 caps and 1 resistor, with no values specified. The 69 era plexi layout has values of 10 or 8 uF for the caps, but it also doe not show a resistor value.

Could you please clarify? Thanks.
Attachments
Marshall 2203 Layout Question.jpg
Question about the unlabeled components:
(25.53 KiB) Downloaded 2160 times

Billy Batz
Senior Member
Posts: 8566
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 8:49 pm

Post by Billy Batz » Mon Jan 30, 2006 3:23 pm

You answered your own question. The 2 bias caps are 8 or 10u. Whichever you can get. I cant be sure which resister your refering to. The one thats attached to the PT is usually 27k in 100W amps and 220k in 50W amps. The rsistor betweent he 2 caps is always 15k and the resistor paralleled to the second cap sets the bias level so its different for every set of tubes. With a bias pot instaleld and for EL34s its usually a 47k resistor.

Post Reply