Iskra vs piher

Everything from original vintage Marshalls to reissues.

Moderator: VelvetGeorge

RockinRocket
Senior Member
Posts: 262
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 10:44 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492

Re: Iskra vs piher

Post by RockinRocket » Tue Jun 14, 2016 8:03 pm

I doubt any one could notice a difference between 47p and 60p let alone 100p in that spot. The bigger the value the more super high frequncys get eliminated. The cathode caps would make a more noticeable effect if a +/- 10% .68uf measured .62uf vs .74uf. The gain boost in those frequency would start to add more low mids the bigger the cap.

Heres a fun little calculator. Adjusting the .820 cathode resistor to the later 2k7 resistor will result in a brighter combination with the .68 uf cap.
https://www.ampbooks.com/mobile/amplifi ... capacitor/

whopperplate
Senior Member
Posts: 491
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:50 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Re: Iskra vs piher

Post by whopperplate » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:48 pm

Ok, that's what I already understood to be true concerning higher values here. I have definitely noticed a preferable difference between 47p and higher values. Thanks for the calculator.

I will post progress on the build in the appropriate forum when time comes. Thank you all.

Charlie
Musicians are like a bowl of cereal
If they aren't Fruits or Nuts they're Flakes

whopperplate
Senior Member
Posts: 491
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:50 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Re: Iskra vs piher

Post by whopperplate » Sun Jun 19, 2016 2:58 pm

Old thread with pertinent info:

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=33920
Musicians are like a bowl of cereal
If they aren't Fruits or Nuts they're Flakes

User avatar
Doug H
Senior Member
Posts: 929
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:56 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Iskra vs piher

Post by Doug H » Sun Aug 14, 2016 11:57 pm

I did a bunch of AB'ing on teh plate of V1 using a piher, a stock cheap carbon film and a couple fancy modern brands. I did feel I could hear a difference, ironically the standard CF sounded the most like the piher to me. Both the fancy brands were cleaner, had less attitude, and one of them seemed to add some compression.

I can't say for sure what I heard was there, but I think every time I forgot which resistor I had switched in I ended up guessing right.

I think on the plates is going to be most revealing, and I have no doubt a guitar with all CC plates will sound different than one with all CF plates, even if they were all matched to within 1 ohm. But between different brands of CF? well I'm a believer, but I could have been hearing things.

whopperplate
Senior Member
Posts: 491
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:50 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Re: Iskra vs piher

Post by whopperplate » Mon Aug 15, 2016 12:21 am

When I swapped in the piher on v1 plates in my 12series amp it became a tad more stiff and lacked the low mids and cutting high end in comparison to the stock metro kit CF 1 watt resistors, probably has something to do with the piher being 1/2 watt I assume. Was unfavorable in this amp so I went back.

AB carbon comp vs piher CF on v1 grid was an obvious difference imo. Piher was cleaner, tighter, and harmonically richer and clearer. AB is mushy and dull in comparison, fat and chewy, but not as percussive. I kept the piher there. Still need to a/b the AB on the plates with other makes.

Charlie
Musicians are like a bowl of cereal
If they aren't Fruits or Nuts they're Flakes

RockinRocket
Senior Member
Posts: 262
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 10:44 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492

Re: Iskra vs piher

Post by RockinRocket » Sun Aug 21, 2016 11:44 am

One difference between modern resitors and Iskras and pihers is the old ones had tined copper leads and probably were leaded. Modern Xicon have no copper and are ROHS compliant. Copper is a better conductor..

But still for me I could turn the amp off wait an hour and it again sounds different with out modding :oops:

jnew
Senior Member
Posts: 1577
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:34 am
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: Front Row Seat From the Outer Continental Shelf

Re: Iskra vs piher

Post by jnew » Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:23 pm

FWIW, take the PI fizzy cap and alligator clip in a 150pF. Play it for a few moments and then alligator in a 25pF. You will hear what happens but even with that big of a swing, it's not a drastic measure but it does make a difference. 8)

And I will add this as well. When I built a 68 plexi, I spent lots of time and $ to find all Iskra's and all Mustards. I can honestly tell you that as accurate as this is, it is sooooo not necessary. My 50 watt with mixed CC's and cheap Carbon Film resistors with cheap Mallory 150 caps, is every bit the amp the 100 watt is. No exceptions.

Lastly, caps in the Cathode Follower positions are of key importance IMO. You can really hear changes from one material to another in these positions. Probably more so than any resistor material changes anywhere else in the circuit. 8)
________________________________
I SEE THINGS BETTER, WHEN I LISTEN


http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default ... ID=1214336" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

RockinRocket
Senior Member
Posts: 262
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 10:44 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492

Re: Iskra vs piher

Post by RockinRocket » Mon Aug 22, 2016 12:52 am

jnew wrote:
Lastly, caps in the Cathode Follower positions are of key importance IMO. You can really hear changes from one material to another in these positions. Probably more so than any resistor material changes anywhere else in the circuit. 8)
Do you have a technical reason for this? I can understand CC resistors having a greater effect there because of the 150+ voltage they see on the follower. But why is there more of a change here for capacitors than for the plates where the caps block much more voltage?

jnew
Senior Member
Posts: 1577
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:34 am
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: Front Row Seat From the Outer Continental Shelf

Re: Iskra vs piher

Post by jnew » Mon Aug 22, 2016 1:39 am

Not sure I understand the question but I say this because I've changed my .68's between Mustards, two different Philips chicklet types, Mallories and WIMA's. These all reveal more noticeable changes than CC resistors and Carbon Film comparisons. 8)
________________________________
I SEE THINGS BETTER, WHEN I LISTEN


http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default ... ID=1214336" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

RockinRocket
Senior Member
Posts: 262
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 10:44 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492

Re: Iskra vs piher

Post by RockinRocket » Mon Aug 22, 2016 11:09 am

Hmm I think I lost you.

You said cap material was more important in the Follower position. Next sentence you talked about resistor composition. Two different things here. I though you were talking about resistors and caps in the cathode follower spot. The tone stack circuit in these amps.

Now your talking about the gain stages cathode bypass cap. Cathode follower capacitor and cathode bypass capacitor are two different things.

Bypass caps have the least tonal change.. if any from my experience and from a technical point.

whopperplate
Senior Member
Posts: 491
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:50 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Re: Iskra vs piher

Post by whopperplate » Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:15 pm

Ahh behold the wonderfully diverse interpretations of the English language.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe all jnew is saying is that the sonic characteristic differences yielded from different capacitor construction materials, when referencing specifically usage in the cathode follower position alone, are far more severe compared to the differences yielded between different resistor construction materials.

Interesting info about modern copper free leads and vintage tinned copper leads. A whole amp with one or another I am sure would produce differences, just arguably discernible as always.

Charlie
Musicians are like a bowl of cereal
If they aren't Fruits or Nuts they're Flakes

jnew
Senior Member
Posts: 1577
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:34 am
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: Front Row Seat From the Outer Continental Shelf

Re: Iskra vs piher

Post by jnew » Mon Aug 22, 2016 11:07 pm

whopperplate wrote:Ahh behold the wonderfully diverse interpretations of the English language.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe all jnew is saying is that the sonic characteristic differences yielded from different capacitor construction materials, when referencing specifically usage in the cathode follower position alone, are far more severe compared to the differences yielded between different resistor construction materials.
Simple as that. 8)
________________________________
I SEE THINGS BETTER, WHEN I LISTEN


http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default ... ID=1214336" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

emmjaydubya
Senior Member
Posts: 376
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 6:51 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Austin

Re: Iskra vs piher

Post by emmjaydubya » Thu Sep 08, 2016 11:18 pm

jnew wrote:I can honestly tell you that as accurate as this is, it is sooooo not necessary. My 50 watt with mixed CC's and cheap Carbon Film resistors with cheap Mallory 150 caps, is every bit the amp the 100 watt is. No exceptions.
Aww jnew yer no fun.

jnew
Senior Member
Posts: 1577
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:34 am
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: Front Row Seat From the Outer Continental Shelf

Re: Iskra vs piher

Post by jnew » Fri Sep 09, 2016 12:50 am

:lol: I know. But believe me, I have no regrets about making that journey. In fact I'm doing another one now but not with Iskra's. All Riken RMG resistors and Mustards. :D
________________________________
I SEE THINGS BETTER, WHEN I LISTEN


http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default ... ID=1214336" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
neikeel
Senior Member
Posts: 7231
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Suffolk, England

Re: Iskra vs piher

Post by neikeel » Fri Sep 09, 2016 4:41 am

jnew

Please clarify exactly what position of caps you mean and the values and materials

You mix cathode bypass caps and cathode follower caps in different emails
Neil

Post Reply