Phase inverter variations in the 70s (Steve Grindrod)

Everything from original vintage Marshalls to reissues.

Moderator: VelvetGeorge

Post Reply
Roe
Senior Member
Posts: 5054
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 1:36 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Drontheim. Norwegen
Contact:

Phase inverter variations in the 70s (Steve Grindrod)

Post by Roe » Sun Jun 12, 2016 2:08 pm

Factory schematics from the late 70s shows that Marshall/Park tweaked the phase inverter to improve balance under overdrive (so that the first power tubes won't redplate and the amp will ghost less). Instead of using two 1m resistors in the phase inverter Marshall/Park used 270k/1m, then 330k/1m and finally 390k/1m (with 100k @ 4ohms negative feedback).

See the following schematics:
- 4140 preamp/twin channel reverb amp
- 2150 preamp/master volume powercel combo preamp
- Park 1210 preamp
See Doyle History of Marshall, pp. 237-8 and 247. See also:
http://vintageamps.com/plexiboard/viewt ... 22#p780322
http://www.myspace.com/20bonesband" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.myspace.com/prostitutes" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Super 100 amps: 1202-119 & 1202-84
JTM45 RS OT JTM50 JMP50 1959/2203/34/39

Roe
Senior Member
Posts: 5054
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 1:36 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Drontheim. Norwegen
Contact:

Re: Phase inverter variations in the 70s (Steve Grindrod)

Post by Roe » Tue Jun 14, 2016 8:30 am

so people care about ghosting and redplating but not about possible solutions?
http://www.myspace.com/20bonesband" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.myspace.com/prostitutes" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Super 100 amps: 1202-119 & 1202-84
JTM45 RS OT JTM50 JMP50 1959/2203/34/39

User avatar
Carbia
Senior Member
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 1:34 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Spain

Re: Phase inverter variations in the 70s (Steve Grindrod)

Post by Carbia » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:11 am

Nice info!

stratonenator
Senior Member
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:24 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Fort Collins, CO

Re: Phase inverter variations in the 70s (Steve Grindrod)

Post by stratonenator » Thu Sep 29, 2016 6:47 pm

Does this effect the overall gain of the amp or will it simply help with balance and ghosting?
So you think your Mesa-Boogie is cool? You won't even be able to hear it over my Marshall Superlead

Roe
Senior Member
Posts: 5054
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 1:36 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Drontheim. Norwegen
Contact:

Re: Phase inverter variations in the 70s (Steve Grindrod)

Post by Roe » Fri Sep 30, 2016 4:28 am

stratonenator wrote:Does this effect the overall gain of the amp or will it simply help with balance and ghosting?
The latter, although the former will be slightly affected if you use a PI input cap that is 2200pf or smaller
http://www.myspace.com/20bonesband" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.myspace.com/prostitutes" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Super 100 amps: 1202-119 & 1202-84
JTM45 RS OT JTM50 JMP50 1959/2203/34/39

User avatar
bill bokey
Senior Member
Posts: 490
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:54 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Phase inverter variations in the 70s (Steve Grindrod)

Post by bill bokey » Fri Sep 30, 2016 5:38 am

Interesting, I never noticed that !
Thanks for the info, Roe :)

Roe
Senior Member
Posts: 5054
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 1:36 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Drontheim. Norwegen
Contact:

Re: Phase inverter variations in the 70s (Steve Grindrod)

Post by Roe » Fri Sep 30, 2016 10:04 pm

The best option seems to be balancing the plate resistors on v3, preferably with a balancing pot like dumble used in conjunction with two resistors (one at each leg). This will really help with balancing the driver, avoiding redplating on one side and minimizing ghosting
http://www.myspace.com/20bonesband" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.myspace.com/prostitutes" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Super 100 amps: 1202-119 & 1202-84
JTM45 RS OT JTM50 JMP50 1959/2203/34/39

Roe
Senior Member
Posts: 5054
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 1:36 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Drontheim. Norwegen
Contact:

Re: Phase inverter variations in the 70s (Steve Grindrod)

Post by Roe » Thu Oct 13, 2016 8:12 am

Really, the best option is do like Traynor and Dumble did in order to balance the phase inverter and to get max power. Traynor used a 1meg balancing trim pot instead of the two 1meg resistors, sometimes with a small resistor at one leg. Duble used a trim pot between the two plate resistors
http://www.myspace.com/20bonesband" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.myspace.com/prostitutes" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Super 100 amps: 1202-119 & 1202-84
JTM45 RS OT JTM50 JMP50 1959/2203/34/39

stratonenator
Senior Member
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:24 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Fort Collins, CO

Re: Phase inverter variations in the 70s (Steve Grindrod)

Post by stratonenator » Tue Oct 25, 2016 5:58 pm

Roe, I can't seem to find a schematic of what you're referring to. Do you have either the traynor layout or the dumble one?
So you think your Mesa-Boogie is cool? You won't even be able to hear it over my Marshall Superlead

Post Reply