i made an interesting observation about my super amp.....
the tone controls,at least to me, seem way more "active",or have a "wider"
range, than my regular 1959's!
it's the same tone circuit, right?? anyone else experience this?
45-100 tone controls
Moderator: VelvetGeorge
-
lifer
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1246
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:40 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
-
HTH
- Senior Member
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 8:53 am
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Newcastle, UK
- Contact:
Re: 45-100 tone controls
your SLP will have a 33k slope resistor and 470pF treble cap
the 45/100 will have a 56k slope resistor and 250pF treble cap
as such, I'd expect the 45/100 to have more responsive tone controls.
the 45/100 will have a 56k slope resistor and 250pF treble cap
as such, I'd expect the 45/100 to have more responsive tone controls.
"If you can possibly manage the time, please play both sides at one meeting"
http://www.youtube.com/TeleCustom72" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.youtube.com/TeleCustom72" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
lifer
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1246
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:40 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
Re: 45-100 tone controls
yeah,I don't know.....
all my SL's have the 56k/250
all my SL's have the 56k/250
-
shakti
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 9:06 am
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Ramnes, Norway
Re: 45-100 tone controls
Maybe due to the higher voltage on V2 in a JTM45/100?
JTM45 RS OT, 1973 18W, JTM45/100, JTM50, JMP50 1986, JMP100 "West Coast", AC15, AC30, BF Super Reverb, Boogie Mk 1, Hiwatt CP103, DR103
-
novosibir
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4654
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:32 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Nuernberg, Germany
- Contact:
Re: 45-100 tone controls
"regular" 1959's do have 33K/500p in the tone stack.lifer wrote:... than my regular 1959's!
then they aren't "regular", but tweaked.lifer wrote:all my SL's have the 56k/250
Larry
The fault almost always is sitting in front of the amp 
Larry's Website now with included Pix's Gallery
Larry's Website now with included Pix's Gallery
-
Roe
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5054
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 1:36 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Drontheim. Norwegen
- Contact:
Re: 45-100 tone controls
perhaps the reason is that the jtm is cleaner wheras the 1959 is more distorted (so that the poweramp shapes the eq more)?
http://www.myspace.com/20bonesband" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.myspace.com/prostitutes" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Super 100 amps: 1202-119 & 1202-84
JTM45 RS OT JTM50 JMP50 1959/2203/34/39
http://www.myspace.com/prostitutes" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Super 100 amps: 1202-119 & 1202-84
JTM45 RS OT JTM50 JMP50 1959/2203/34/39
-
lifer
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1246
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:40 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
Re: 45-100 tone controls
yes......you are correct!! that's the way i should have stated it.novosibir wrote:"regular" 1959's do have 33K/500p in the tone stack.lifer wrote:... than my regular 1959's!
then they aren't "regular", but tweaked.lifer wrote:all my SL's have the 56k/250
Larry
by "regular", i meant EL34 powered,etc.
-
Flames1950
- Senior Member
- Posts: 9294
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:04 am
- Location: Waukee, Iowa
Re: 45-100 tone controls
In a split-cathode Lead, you've also already shaped the EQ balance to a degree, with the choices of cathode resistor and cap on the Bright channel (usually the 2.7K/.68uF combo) and the coupling cap into the next stage (less bass right off if you're running the .0022uF coupling cap.)
-
lifer
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1246
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:40 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
Re: 45-100 tone controls
yep-- 10-4!
i suppose the "mixer" values have an affect also. put 'em all together and it's
a bit of a different beast.
i suppose the "mixer" values have an affect also. put 'em all together and it's
a bit of a different beast.