Live Without a Net confusion

The man, the band, and everything else

Moderators: VelvetGeorge, RACKSYSTEMS

User avatar
wjamflan
Senior Member
Posts: 941
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:06 am
Just the numbers in order: 7

Re: Live Without a Net confusion

Post by wjamflan » Tue Mar 10, 2015 12:29 pm

Santino wrote:That's some good dectective work! So he obviously just retuned the 5150 Kramer.
Thank you. Hope it helps.

User avatar
JimiJames
Senior Member
Posts: 3550
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 6:32 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: Live Without a Net confusion

Post by JimiJames » Tue Mar 10, 2015 1:11 pm

wjamflan wrote:
Santino wrote:That's some good dectective work! So he obviously just retuned the 5150 Kramer.
Thank you. Hope it helps.
Right you are , Santino. Thanks wjamflan 8)
RIP Mark Abrahamian-rockstah -classmate/roommate
RIP Ben Wise -StuntDouble- comrade-in-arms

__________________________________________
Build'sClip'sVid's

User avatar
donnyboiler
Senior Member
Posts: 229
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 8:20 am
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: Essex, UK

Re: Live Without a Net confusion

Post by donnyboiler » Tue Mar 10, 2015 4:14 pm

This is banging info guys, thanks!

The guitars do indeed look identical. Just two points to raise now:

1. There seems to be some disagreement over the pitch of the song. It's definitely C, not C#. I just checked with one of my Eb guitars and the D-Tuna pulled out and it's still a semitone too high. The live version is lower than the album version I believe.

2. If he was indeed using 9-40 strings during this period (which isn't the first time I've read that) that low C string would have been INSANELY floppy at that pitch. Like I say, I can do it on my 9-46s but it's an effort to keep it in tune on those thumping low notes.

So if it is the same guitar he must have been re-stringing in between songs, surely? I see no evidence of a floppy low C on the vid. Which raises two more questions : how would he do it in time (three songs is enough but the bass solo probably isn't) and how would they get the tuning rock solid? I mean yeah, stretch, retune, stretch, retune, stretch, retune - but at some point you're gonna run out of time and you're taking a guitar with new strings onto a hot stage and letting Ed rip the shit out of it. I don't think the tuning would be as solid as it is.

So we have two possibilities as I see it: Ed managed with the same set of strings somehow OR there was a super-exact copy.

User avatar
wjamflan
Senior Member
Posts: 941
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:06 am
Just the numbers in order: 7

Re: Live Without a Net confusion

Post by wjamflan » Sat Mar 14, 2015 5:25 am

donnyboiler wrote:2. If he was indeed using 9-40 strings during this period (which isn't the first time I've read that) that low C string would have been INSANELY floppy at that pitch. Like I say, I can do it on my 9-46s but it's an effort to keep it in tune on those thumping low notes.
I have my strat with 9-40s tuned that way as we speak. It works just fine, but I agree about the tuning part. The only thing is I don't have Floyd on there. I still think re-tuning is what he did, but I'm open to suggestion :wink:

User avatar
garbeaj
Senior Member
Posts: 3020
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 12:58 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Live Without a Net confusion

Post by garbeaj » Thu Mar 19, 2015 1:03 pm

wjamflan wrote:My guess is Ed used three guitars. Whether or not he used heavier strings on the 5150 so he could tune down during the drum solo is still up in the air from interviews of the time. Here's the setlist in case it was hard to gather from my earlier post:

You Really Got Me - 5150 (standard)
One Way To Rock - 5150 (standard)
Summer Nights - Steinberger
Get Up - Steinberger
Drum Solo - Ed/Zeke tune 5150 down a whole step
Dreams - 5150 (tuned down)
5150 - 5150 (tuned down)
Bass Solo - Ed/Zeke tune 5150 up to standard
Panama- 5150 (standard)
Best Of Both Worlds/Addicted To Love - 5150 (standard)
Love Walks In
Good Enough - 1984 (Bass A string)
Guitar Solo - 5150 (standard)
55 - 5150 (standard) & Steinberger
Ain't Talkin' 'Bout Love - Steinberger
Wild Thing - 5150 (standard)
Why Can't This Be Love
Rock & Roll - 5150 (standard)


It's just a guess but it's the best I've got....
I'm certain "Good Enough" was in most of the sets...When I saw them in October of 1986 it was either the second song after "You Really Got Me" or it was the first song of the set.

User avatar
JimiJames
Senior Member
Posts: 3550
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 6:32 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: EPM museum 10/14

Post by JimiJames » Sun Aug 23, 2015 2:40 pm

Image
Image
Image
Image
Why is this one in museum ?
RIP Mark Abrahamian-rockstah -classmate/roommate
RIP Ben Wise -StuntDouble- comrade-in-arms

__________________________________________
Build'sClip'sVid's

User avatar
garbeaj
Senior Member
Posts: 3020
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 12:58 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Live Without a Net confusion

Post by garbeaj » Mon Aug 24, 2015 6:19 pm

What museum? Rock and Roll Hall of Fame? What's that Ovation classical there?

EJSLPlexi
Senior Member
Posts: 894
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:44 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7

Re: Live Without a Net confusion

Post by EJSLPlexi » Fri Oct 30, 2015 8:45 am

garbeaj wrote:What museum? Rock and Roll Hall of Fame? What's that Ovation classical there?
I think that is the ovation ed used on spanish fly
it is laying down on the ground in the famous group shot
Image

User avatar
garbeaj
Senior Member
Posts: 3020
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 12:58 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Live Without a Net confusion

Post by garbeaj » Sat Oct 31, 2015 6:41 pm

EJSLPlexi wrote:
garbeaj wrote:What museum? Rock and Roll Hall of Fame? What's that Ovation classical there?
I think that is the ovation ed used on spanish fly
it is laying down on the ground in the famous group shot
Is the Kramer pic at the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame?

Post Reply