Ed's Franky (beneath the paint)

The man, the band, and everything else

Moderators: VelvetGeorge, RACKSYSTEMS

Post Reply
User avatar
rdodson
Senior Member
Posts: 561
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 10:15 am

Re: Ed's Franky (beneath the paint)

Post by rdodson » Sat May 02, 2015 8:27 pm

Yeah, forgot about the HFT one. But yeah, those were custom one-offs compared to what you see at the Hollywood GC and so forth.
garbeaj wrote:
rdodson wrote:
EJSLPlexi wrote:dude the VH kramers were poplar i dont get why that is so hard to beleive? :what:
There were two sets. The 5150 and 1984 and then there were the bazillion factory made backups.
Exactly...the 5150, the 1984 and the Hot For Teacher were one offs that had little to do with the production model Kramers and the dozens (if not more) red, white and black striped back up Kramers. The Sports company was providing the bodies for Kramer during the early days of Ed's association with Kramer and there is no reason to believe that they provided Kramer with only Poplar bodies. The only reason that anyone claims that the 5150 was made out of Poplar is that they have seen the "Secrets of the Kramer 5150" YouTube clip and they accept the unfounded opinion that the guy that made that video has that the 5150 was made of Poplar. I wish someone would take that clip down...it has some good information, but the poplar theory is just an opinion with nothing to back it up.

Basically the guy in that video falls prey to the mindset of "Well the production model Kramers used "X" and "Y" so therefore the 5150, the 1984 and the Hot For Teacher must have been made of "X" and "Y". That is just wrong. The deal is that the three main Kramers that Ed used most often which were designed, built and used for the first time on the 1984 tour were completely custom made instruments that were completely different than any production model Kramer ever made, up to and including the Gibson/Kramer "1984" model.
Ron Dodson
Dallas
Romans 9:16

User avatar
JimiJames
Senior Member
Posts: 3550
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 6:32 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: Ed's Franky (beneath the paint)

Post by JimiJames » Mon May 04, 2015 9:56 pm

Always needing strings, rockstah & I had stopped into Valley Arts to restock. We checked out the usual guitars & amps and sifting through some necks (that were in a barrel ?) and several bodies. Mark handed me a (Basswood) body with a raised eyebrow. I immediately noticed how light it was. The body was also light in color and had a real smooth feel. You could leave fingernail markings without trying too hard. It was like Balsa. A very light Basswood run. I wondered how the bridge posts were going to hold up over time.
This was sometime after the Allan Holdsworth seminar (w/Chad Wackerman & Jeff Berlin), prior to his next appearance with Eddie. He was using his Charvel's, but I am not sure what they were and recall he liked Basswood in a Q&A. He might of had a proto-type Ibanez AH-10 with Ebony IIRC came into production 1984, so very possible. Those were a very light Basswood. Again, just before Eddie's appearance with Allan on stage several months prior. Allan had his processed/rackmount sounds that make Ukelele sound good.

Here is a Poplar body that was made by Fender's - soon to be Custom Shop. It is off the HM Strat model, but a square (Tele) body. Marketed for Budweiser; it was red and had Bud DRY in huge letters plastered on the front, so that had to go. I stripped it down, filled the whammy cavity & repainted in lacquer. Installed a heavy duty solid brass hardtail. I used an '89 Eric Clapton "Blackie" mid-boost circuit and EVAN's (SRV studio) pickups, but I had to do a lot to get it to sound beefy and gig with. Image
Overall, I doctored up this Poplar body the best I really could. It still fell short of my expectations.
Basswood & Poplar are lacking something in frequencies. A hollowness ???
It needs something?... Bookmatched or a complimentary body style or the right hardware. Gets to be high maintenance :-/

The neck was sold, so this Poplar body is headed to the butcher block, and being converted to a full size Stratocaster. Keeping the center intact to hold the 25.15 spec, and building up around for the new contour. Either Alder or N. Ash is fine.
Or, do what Suhr (EVH) is doing. Keep the (Basswood) Poplar and glue on a Maple top !

Image Image
Image
I'm not a builder, but from a play'ears side I really think Basswood or Poplar aren't that good on their own unless
they are getting help from somewherez...

User avatar
Tone Slinger
Senior Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 10:31 am

Re: Ed's Franky (beneath the paint)

Post by Tone Slinger » Wed May 06, 2015 8:26 am

Cool geetar JJ :thumbsup:

I agree about basswood and poplar. Either species, on their own, really do seem to offer up a non distinguished tone........the plus side is that they match well with a WIDE variety of amplifier/speaker types, but the down side is they 'tend' to lack that elitist next level when partnered with the right amp.
I always go back to Blackmore when considering body wood. The clear ash strat he used (alot on 'BURN', Cali Jam '74, 'Stormbringer' and the first Rainbow album) had that extended bite and top end clarity as compared to say the ' Made In Japan' and the later Rainbow albums (Alder). I REALLY hear alot of Ed's tone (and playing technique) on much of Ritchie's earlier work.
Rip Ben Wise (StuntDouble) & Mark Abrahamian (Rockstah)

User avatar
garbeaj
Senior Member
Posts: 3020
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 12:58 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Ed's Franky (beneath the paint)

Post by garbeaj » Wed May 06, 2015 2:20 pm

Tone Slinger wrote:Cool geetar JJ :thumbsup:

I agree about basswood and poplar. Either species, on their own, really do seem to offer up a non distinguished tone........the plus side is that they match well with a WIDE variety of amplifier/speaker types, but the down side is they 'tend' to lack that elitist next level when partnered with the right amp.
I always go back to Blackmore when considering body wood. The clear ash strat he used (alot on 'BURN', Cali Jam '74, 'Stormbringer' and the first Rainbow album) had that extended bite and top end clarity as compared to say the ' Made In Japan' and the later Rainbow albums (Alder). I REALLY hear alot of Ed's tone (and playing technique) on much of Ritchie's earlier work.
Not to sidetrack too much on Blackmore and Ed, but maybe you could do a thread where you breakdown specific licks that you hear from Blackmore that Ed plays and give examples like me and Bill have done with the live Cream/Clapton connection with Ed's playing? I just don't hear it :what:

User avatar
Strat78
Senior Member
Posts: 3093
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:38 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: though I'm standing still, I'm in a moving place.

Re: Ed's Franky (beneath the paint)

Post by Strat78 » Wed May 06, 2015 10:52 pm

I think Blackmore was one of the first to move those index finger two/three note chords around while riding the A or low E string. Ronny Montrose used it, then Ed with RWTD, Unchained...., then all those 80's bands did the same thing but without any swagger or swing, i.e. Dokken or Rhatt etc...though Jake E Lee pushed it to a new zone.

User avatar
garbeaj
Senior Member
Posts: 3020
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 12:58 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Ed's Franky (beneath the paint)

Post by garbeaj » Thu May 07, 2015 8:25 am

Strat78 wrote:I think Blackmore was one of the first to move those index finger two/three note chords around while riding the A or low E string. Ronny Montrose used it, then Ed with RWTD, Unchained...., then all those 80's bands did the same thing but without any swagger or swing, i.e. Dokken or Rhatt etc...though Jake E Lee pushed it to a new zone.
That was done well in advance of any of those players...virtually all of them stole it from Brian Jones and Keith Richards on nearly every early (pre-1968) Stones song in standard tuning. The open G stuff in the later Stones stuff like "Brown Sugar" was just an extension of that.

jnew
Senior Member
Posts: 1577
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:34 am
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: Front Row Seat From the Outer Continental Shelf

Re: Ed's Franky (beneath the paint)

Post by jnew » Sat May 09, 2015 12:05 am

Agreed about Poplar bodies. Ok at best but doesn't make a favorite by any means. Basswood is quite dull and is soft but with a quality maple cap, can sound pretty good. Ash or Alder seem to be the go to woods for one wood bodies. Mohagony and Korina are really good too and Maple caps on them make great tones IMO.
________________________________
I SEE THINGS BETTER, WHEN I LISTEN


http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default ... ID=1214336" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

EJSLPlexi
Senior Member
Posts: 894
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:44 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7

Re: Ed's Franky (beneath the paint)

Post by EJSLPlexi » Mon May 11, 2015 12:46 pm

jnew wrote:Agreed about Poplar bodies. Ok at best but doesn't make a favorite by any means. Basswood is quite dull and is soft but with a quality maple cap, can sound pretty good. .
yeah I LOVE my EBMM axis and it definitely sounds much better than "pretty good" :lol:

jnew
Senior Member
Posts: 1577
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:34 am
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: Front Row Seat From the Outer Continental Shelf

Re: Ed's Franky (beneath the paint)

Post by jnew » Mon May 11, 2015 3:20 pm

I glad it works for you. I just appreciate the shape of those things but set up well, they're good players.
________________________________
I SEE THINGS BETTER, WHEN I LISTEN


http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default ... ID=1214336" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

jnew
Senior Member
Posts: 1577
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:34 am
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: Front Row Seat From the Outer Continental Shelf

Re: Ed's Franky (beneath the paint)

Post by jnew » Sun May 24, 2015 7:51 am

Oops. I meant to say that I "cannot" appreciate the shape of those things. I hate the shape actually but yes, they can play pretty good.
________________________________
I SEE THINGS BETTER, WHEN I LISTEN


http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default ... ID=1214336" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
GilmourD
Senior Member
Posts: 144
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 7:47 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492

Re: Ed's Franky (beneath the paint)

Post by GilmourD » Sun May 24, 2015 3:02 pm

jnew wrote:Agreed about Poplar bodies. Ok at best but doesn't make a favorite by any means. Basswood is quite dull and is soft but with a quality maple cap, can sound pretty good. Ash or Alder seem to be the go to woods for one wood bodies. Mohagony and Korina are really good too and Maple caps on them make great tones IMO.
I have a 2004 Peavey Wolfgang Special without a maple top and I certainly wouldn't call it dull. It's probably my most harmonically rich guitar.

I have two Teles currently (used to have three, but sold that one). My older one is poplar and the newer one is a swamp ash Warmoth body. Both have 3-saddle ashtray bridges. They sound very different (the ash obviously has that zing that ash does) but the poplar body has this full-bodied twang that I love. The one I sold off was alder and was meh...

There's a lot of variation between trees or even planks from the same tree. There's a shared general characteristic, but you can still get a good chunk of wood or a not so good chunk of wood.

Right now I have three guitars I play out with, one being my Wolfgang (standard tuned). The other is my metallic orange HSS Strat with a Floyd which is alder (1/2 step down) and my old Frankenstein (standard tuned) which has a basswood body originally from a Fernandes LE-2 and a Customwoods 5150 neck. I'm currently building a "what if Eddie didn't paint Franky red" with a Locke Custom Guitars ash Azusa body drilled for the Floyd for my second 1/2 step down guitar.

User avatar
plexified
Senior Member
Posts: 856
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 12:49 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: amidst the wreckage of a hot Plexi

Re: Ed's Franky (beneath the paint)

Post by plexified » Sun May 24, 2015 10:32 pm

Korina is one of my favorite woods and it sounds great with laquer . Funny enough is that I find the Basswood is very similar when incapsulated in the resin dip , like Kramer did in the 80's and the Ripley is a prime example with a maple neck. It is a barn burner . Without that super hard finish much like what was used in the 50's to seal strats , its kinda dead sounding. BUT with that coating , it screams and is super resonant at high volumes in particular. Its a resonant superstar imho.

jnew
Senior Member
Posts: 1577
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:34 am
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: Front Row Seat From the Outer Continental Shelf

Re: Ed's Franky (beneath the paint)

Post by jnew » Mon May 25, 2015 1:05 am

Good one Plexified. I hadn't thought of that but a hard resin finish would be a great catalyst to springing some liveliness into a a basswood body. :thumbsup:
________________________________
I SEE THINGS BETTER, WHEN I LISTEN


http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default ... ID=1214336" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
chrisom
Senior Member
Posts: 1351
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 9:04 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: A Free Republic?

Re: Ed's Franky (beneath the paint)

Post by chrisom » Mon May 25, 2015 1:37 am

Here is one man's opinion on the cost, sound, use and 'why' of tonewood selection by guitar manufacturers. A bit drawn out, but it covers most all woods used today and provides some interesting insight. Watch it and see if you agree... :scratch:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mVmFlzksMCE

User avatar
GilmourD
Senior Member
Posts: 144
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 7:47 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492

Re: Ed's Franky (beneath the paint)

Post by GilmourD » Mon May 25, 2015 8:45 am

chrisom wrote:Here is one man's opinion on the cost, sound, use and 'why' of tonewood selection by guitar manufacturers. A bit drawn out, but it covers most all woods used today and provides some interesting insight. Watch it and see if you agree... :scratch:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mVmFlzksMCE
Man, that video is making the rounds this way. Somebody over at the Seymour Duncan forum tried to use that video as proof that MIM Standards and Custom Shop Masterbuilt guitars are the same exact thing minus price tag.

That guy is mostly wrong. Sure, some things are indeed overpriced, but there's A LOT he doesn't take into account.

And he also references Scott Grove... Whether you side with him or argue against him you're on the losing side of the battle... That guy's just... I can't even think of words that describe him properly.

Post Reply