Slaving a Plexi Project

For all things to build the brown sound

Moderators: VelvetGeorge, RACKSYSTEMS

Post Reply
IloveMyMarshall
Senior Member
Posts: 1786
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:18 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Florida Sunshine State of Confusion

Re: Slaving a Plexi Project

Post by IloveMyMarshall » Fri Sep 26, 2008 9:36 pm

erigm wrote:Rockstah,

Sorry for my slow reply. This is the thread I was talking about ( I think).

http://forum.metroamp.com/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=20611" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

They talk about a "reamp" box and bringing the signal down even more to instrument level and high impedance. Mark Cameron contributes in this thread too, and I think there is eventually a schematic of a type of line out with tranny, but Mark suggests some different values to get it closer to what I would assume would be the Jose line out box.

I thought Mark had at one point posted pictures of the Jose load/line out box. It might've been on the Plexi Palace BB. It wasn't even a box ...just looked like a stack of resistors chained together. I don't have the pictures though. Just remember them.

Here
Attachments
jose4.jpg
(43.9 KiB) Downloaded 1647 times
jose 3.jpg
(45.49 KiB) Downloaded 1641 times
jose 2.jpg
(38.24 KiB) Downloaded 1634 times
jose1.jpg
(42.87 KiB) Downloaded 1638 times
Metro 2204
Metro JTM 45/50
Next Super lead??
http://www.soundclick.com/ilovemymarshall" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

erigm
Senior Member
Posts: 736
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 11:29 am
Contact:

Re: Slaving a Plexi Project

Post by erigm » Fri Sep 26, 2008 9:43 pm

I just had an idea. Has anyone tried using a line out (either tapped load or hotplate) and then running backward through a direct box? So it would be amp -> load -> lineout -> mic side of direct box -> instrument side of direct box -> next amp. I'm not sure where the FX would go, line level or instrument level (before or after the direct box).
erigm

MARCO
Senior Member
Posts: 1029
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:03 am
Location: IL

Re: Slaving a Plexi Project

Post by MARCO » Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:26 pm

How does this mpa compare to the one Dave Friedman did for me? You have seen my amp under the hood Rockstah
MARC34

User avatar
rockstah
Senior Member
Posts: 12481
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 12:28 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Austin Texas

Re: Slaving a Plexi Project

Post by rockstah » Sat Sep 27, 2008 9:39 pm

changed some things using a duncan 59 - trex replica delay after amp 1 - ge10 in front of amp 1
oh and i used the 47k line out version

http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page_so ... ID=6926626" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

MARCO yeah ive seen your amp - mine is a superlead spec -

also this is my chris mer'n amp that i built using his iron a while back-
i swapped out the OT for a merc self lead OT -im using the mer'n PT on the high tap - about 486 on the plates.

so i guess u could say they are very close ;) - although your merc ot is not selflead.

Mark
Last edited by rockstah on Sun Sep 28, 2008 1:16 am, edited 2 times in total.

MARCO
Senior Member
Posts: 1029
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:03 am
Location: IL

Re: Slaving a Plexi Project

Post by MARCO » Sat Sep 27, 2008 9:49 pm

I thought Dave did it that way....oh well. I think me using the Blackbacks compared to you using the Greenbacks may make it sound slightly different.
MARC34

User avatar
rockstah
Senior Member
Posts: 12481
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 12:28 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Austin Texas

Re: Slaving a Plexi Project

Post by rockstah » Sat Sep 27, 2008 9:51 pm

and also the fact that im slaving it into a clean power amp.

bmf5150
Senior Member
Posts: 4046
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2003 4:41 pm

Re: Slaving a Plexi Project

Post by bmf5150 » Sat Sep 27, 2008 9:51 pm

sounds great mark!!
R.I.P My precious daughter Aubrey Marie May 20th to May 23rd 2006,we love and miss you!
My EVH sound clips.
http://soundclick.com/share?songid=7782093" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
rockstah
Senior Member
Posts: 12481
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 12:28 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Austin Texas

Re: Slaving a Plexi Project

Post by rockstah » Sat Sep 27, 2008 9:52 pm

Stan i thought the 59 sounds thin compared to the SD/A5 but maybe u think it sounds better than the first clip?

bmf5150
Senior Member
Posts: 4046
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2003 4:41 pm

Re: Slaving a Plexi Project

Post by bmf5150 » Sat Sep 27, 2008 10:18 pm

its very close,u go between my voodoo 59,my super distortion and my wolfgang pickup daily..i still cant make my mind up..just for reference the SD-A5 is very close sounding to a wolfgang pickup..the voodoo 59 is identical to a duncan 59 just not as harsh on the high end..
R.I.P My precious daughter Aubrey Marie May 20th to May 23rd 2006,we love and miss you!
My EVH sound clips.
http://soundclick.com/share?songid=7782093" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
fivecoyote
Senior Member
Posts: 1419
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:28 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: NJ
Contact:

Re: Slaving a Plexi Project

Post by fivecoyote » Sat Sep 27, 2008 11:34 pm

Awesome sound/tone, Rockstah. That is IT in caps. What's left except to play until you pass out from exhaustion, fingertips bleeding, the works. Congrats. I am a relative late arrival here, but it seems like it was a long journey -- and you arrived.

Just think of all the people out there who, if they heard that, would sh*t. I definitely did... :lol: I can't wait to let a couple buddies hear that clip. I will make sure the cardiac paddles are handy!
At it awhile, still learnin'

Get woodalicious tonology factoid learnin' at http://www.WOODYTONE.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;!

User avatar
908ssp
Senior Member
Posts: 2954
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 12:56 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Michigan
Contact:

Re: Slaving a Plexi Project

Post by 908ssp » Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:12 am

The sound was great it was just too short. :wink: I just wanted to hear more. It sounds so clean yet distorted.

leadguy
Senior Member
Posts: 2740
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 10:37 am

Re: Slaving a Plexi Project

Post by leadguy » Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:59 am

Here's the missing ingredient on using the second amp. It must be a low gain plexi circuit - a la a JTM45; a higher gain preamp on the 2nd amp such as a 12000 series won't work. Use the Vol I input but use the lower one because you don't want to distort the 2nd amp. Then you need to do "impedance matching" from the line out of the first amp to the input of the 2nd plexi - this is the key and is the function of the transformer in the Jose load box. It matches a line output impedance to the guitar input impedance. If you just stick a standard line out signal directly into a guitar amp input it won't sound exactly right, which many have tried with no luck. By using the preamp section of the second plexi, you get the benefit of the tone stack on the second amp. Jose was a genius.
from Mark Camerons post at

"This is something like it but no resistor(10k) and a 250k pot with a 68k from the wiper to ground and I think its a step down transformer not 1:1 also." http://forum.metroamp.com/viewtopic.php ... a&start=30" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The step down transformer seems to be 10K on amp 1's side and 600 ohms on amp 2's side which will step down amp 1's output by roughly a 1/4. http://forum.metroamp.com/viewtopic.php ... 34#p202534" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; A 1:1 no step down or step up transformer could be used just as well.

Image

Rough calculations

A Marshall 100 wattt amp delivering 100 watts to it's load outputs around 28.28 volts.

Power = current * voltage
Voltage = current * resistance or current = voltage / resistance

so Power = (voltage * voltage) / resistance

so 100 watts * 8 ohms = (voltage * voltage)
so the square root of 800 = voltage

= 28.28 volts into a 8 ohm load


A 600 ohm to 10K transformer will step up the voltage by the turns ratio which is 4.1.

Turns ratio = the square root of (secondary impedance / primary impedance)

So there would be 28.28 * 4.1 volts (116 volts) hitting the voltage divider (10k resistor and 5 k pot).

A 600 ohm to 600 ohm transformer has a turns ratio of 1 so it doesn't step the voltage up or down so there would be 28.28 volts hitting the voltage divider (10k resistor and 5 k pot).

Very high output pickups can output around 1 volt so the 28.28 volts or 116 volts has to be voltage divided down to at least 1 volt so why have 116 volts from the 600 ohm 10 k step up transformer hitting the voltage divider when 28.28 volts hitting the voltage divider from a 600 ohm 600 ohm transformer would be more than enough.


What is the point of a 600 ohm to 10K step up transformer? It doesn't need to match impedances like a mic as the Marshall input is a high impedance voltage transfer input and not a power transfer input. The Marshall input is designed to be high impedance for maximum voltage transfer (bridging impedance) from the high impedance guitar pickups and not for maximum power transfer from the high impedance guitar pickups.

If the transformer is a 10K (primary) 600 ohm (secondary) step down transformer then the turns ratio is 0.245 and the voltage hitting the 10k and 5k pot voltage divder is 6.9 volts and this makes sense and this is what Mark Cameron describes.

http://www.tape.com/resource/impedance.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.bnoack.com/index.html?http&& ... ormer.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Last edited by leadguy on Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
"When your swinging, Swing some MORE" ~Monk

leadguy
Senior Member
Posts: 2740
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 10:37 am

Re: Slaving a Plexi Project

Post by leadguy » Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:03 am

i thought the 59 sounds thin compared to the SD/A5
That's what I think. The first clip sounded better IMO. The VH1 Destroyer had A8 Super 70 PAFs and the VH1 Franky might have had a lot of different pickups like a Mighty Mite or a DiMarzio or a Super 70 or a Gibson PAF.
"When your swinging, Swing some MORE" ~Monk

laneychris
Senior Member
Posts: 230
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:02 am

Re: Slaving a Plexi Project

Post by laneychris » Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:56 am

This latest clip is the best...you've got the frankie tone down if you did the bmf5150 clips like he did with the original and then fades into your tone that would quail the naysayers but hey I don't think anyone has said your way off, I would be very pleased with the results if it were me.. Thanks for sharing your info and awesome clips 8)

User avatar
StuntDouble
Senior Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:26 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: the left coast

Re: Slaving a Plexi Project

Post by StuntDouble » Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:58 pm

Does anyone know, in theory, if you could you run a low to high impedance matching microphone transformer out of your amp/attenuator's lineout and achieve the desired result

http://accessories.musiciansfriend.com/ ... sku=330710" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://store.a2zcable.com/audio-audio-a ... --xlr.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Post Reply