Correct, as long as different doesn't mean worseCoffeeTones wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2019 5:38 pmEvery amp is different, so clones built down to the last detail will be different. Trainwreck clones have proven that well.

Moderator: VelvetGeorge
Correct, as long as different doesn't mean worseCoffeeTones wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2019 5:38 pmEvery amp is different, so clones built down to the last detail will be different. Trainwreck clones have proven that well.
There's been too much rant & fight over the last 10 pages, so the moderator's have decided at that time, to pull this thread off public - and on the same day I've startet this pt. 2 thread at that time back in Jan 2010itsneverloudenough wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 1:03 pmFellas I'm sorry if I'm reviving inactive threads but I've been curious about something: the title and first page of this thread make it clear that there was a "part 1" thread about the SIR amp before this one. Could I ask what was in that thread and exactly why it was hidden/deleted?
Makes sense, thanks for clarifying that. Would you happen to know anything about my other question, i.e. where the first "clues" of #36's specs came from?novosibir wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 2:13 pmThere's been too much rant & fight over the last 10 pages, so the moderator's have decided at that time, to pull this thread off public - and on the same day I've startet this pt. 2 thread at that time back in Jan 2010
Just have checked in the moderator's section and have seen, that this thread has been entirely deleted, because among many other pulled threads I couldn't find it anymore.
My idea is, that it's a colorful mix of myths, rumors and some logic of many, because none of all ever have taken a look inside the #39, the #36 and the #34 since then and even Frank Levi (RIP) couldn't recall exactly later, what he'd done to the S.I.R. amps at that time.itsneverloudenough wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 2:39 pmWould you happen to know anything about my other question, i.e. where the first "clues" of #36's specs came from?
Doesn't sound like he wants to "post" them, more like looking to cash in otherwise why sit on it. Don't think he has the amps though. But those schems, not gonna lie his post kills me...I'm not blaming him for what he does with his own stuff I just hope he doesn't dwell on it too much or end up wasting the opportunity, he's the only link to those magic amps left. Levi tried to put out his own amps too but never did, sadly (oddly enough he never shared the real specs despite having no apparent commercial interest). There's nothing else to go off of, for all we know the real #36 is scrap now and that other guy with the alleged replica...wouldn't bet on him...Unique wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 6:56 pmThanks for sharing Coffee, that is a very interesting post. I've read that thread before, but not since Glenn posted. It would be nice if he has them and posted them. I would like to know which one of those guys from S.I.R. has #36 and #39 hidden away? For the longest time I thought maybe it was Frank, or Glenn. But really, I'm actually surprised no one who might have rented either amp back in the day, possibly could have taken it home, had a peek inside, and made a schem of it, then some years later post it in an amp thread somewhere. I know there was one guy who worked at S.I.R. back in the 90's who did that with one of their amps, S.I.R. #38. But not much else about that amp other than that.
So the first clues of what #36 looks like as a circuit were acquired by Caswell? I thought it turned out he had nothing to do with it after all and the mod was all Frank Levi. Did Frank base his mod off of Caswell's previously installed mod?CoffeeTones wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2019 5:42 pmWe have the original #39 schematic drawn and signed by Tim Caswell. Glenn Buckley may have the others from what he says here http://forum.metropoulos.net/viewtopic. ... 45#p468281
Typically for modders in their first 5 to 10 years of amp modding.CoffeeTones wrote: ↑Mon Dec 16, 2019 2:05 pm... #36 was said not to be a copy of #39, but may have had a few similarities. Comparisons of tracks and Caswell #39 builds, support that Caswell #39 and #36 sound different. I seem to recall something about #39 having the Caswell mod taken out, and being modded into something different at some point.
Well, according to Frank, Caswell's #39 had fallen out of favor with renters and had been sitting for awhile. So Frank asked Glenn if he could rework it. Which he claims he did and this is the #39 that Slash used in preproduction, and the one that George Lynch fell in love with. Clearly, Frank's #39 and #36 had to sound pretty close for Slash not to have recognized a difference when S.I.R gave Slash #36 to record AFD with after he had reserved #39 for these sessions. I guess someone from S.I.R. accidentally rented #39 out before hand and did not know Geffen had reserved it for Slash.CoffeeTones wrote: ↑Mon Dec 16, 2019 2:05 pm#39 was a popular rental among stars. It was rented out at the time a second star needed it, so another amp was modded to fill the gap. That was #36 by Frank Levi. That's the story I recall. #36 was said not to be a copy of #39, but may have had a few similarities. Comparisons of tracks and Caswell #39 builds, support that Caswell #39 and #36 sound different. I seem to recall something about #39 having the Caswell mod taken out, and being modded into something different at some point.
That could be due to how it was recorded or mixed. You can completely change the sound of an instrument during mixing. It really depends on what sound and feel the mix engineer was going for. This is something that a lot of people over look about AFD and the tones on that album. The way it was mixed makes the guitars more appealing. Just look at the first Velvet Revolver album, some of Slash's guitar tracks are so berried that overall they just don't sound all that great even though his playing was top notch and he used an amp many people love. That album had some great music, but the way it was mixed killed that album tone wise in my opinion. Another great example of a mix making a song is Michael Jackson's "Billie Jean." If that beat was a 1/2 dB quieter, or had tad bit less bass, or even just a few milliseconds off, that song would have fell flat. So how something is mixed will have a lot to say about what your hearing.itsneverloudenough wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 6:18 amWell take a listen to Signs Of Life and decide...I barely hear any similarity, and only during very specific parts. If there's any relation it's a rather distant one.
By the way, you guys might want to check up on "Billy Blades Amplification" on FB...the last few posts...