EVH 1984 album tone on Girl Gone Bad

For all things to build the brown sound

Moderators: VelvetGeorge, RACKSYSTEMS

Guitarjb
Senior Member
Posts: 599
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 3:35 am

EVH 1984 album tone on Girl Gone Bad

Post by Guitarjb » Wed May 28, 2008 12:03 am

I remember reading somewhere that Ed used his original '58 Gibson Flying V on Girl Gone Bad (same guitar as on Hot For Teacher).

The amp tone sounds like there is some sort of effect on it. Does anyone know what effect(s) are used: a touch of chorus maybe? A very quick delay/echo to fatten up the tone, especially the single notes?

Joe

zak
Senior Member
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 8:00 pm
Location: aussie

Post by zak » Wed May 28, 2008 12:30 am

stereo detune from the eventide unit.

Guitarjb
Senior Member
Posts: 599
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 3:35 am

Post by Guitarjb » Wed May 28, 2008 12:45 am

zak wrote:stereo detune from the eventide unit.


I've never heard of that effect. What does it do, is it similar to a stereo chorus?

Joe

zak
Senior Member
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 8:00 pm
Location: aussie

Post by zak » Wed May 28, 2008 7:49 am

the eventide takes the gtr signal. splits it into L/R.
the left side is pitch shifted down -9 cents and delayed 5ms
the right side is pitch shifted up +9 cents and delayed 25ms.
this is then mixed back in with the dry guitar signal and placed across the stereo field. the result is a huge fat, "jangly" guitar tone.

most people on this board would probably hate it, but if you like the fair warning/1984 tone. you like the eventide.

superboss
Senior Member
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:09 pm

Post by superboss » Wed May 28, 2008 8:09 am

It gives the effect of movement from side to side ((STEREO)) field. The movement can be increased or turned basically off by adjusting the manual knob on the 910 or 949, Then it's coupled with a 25 or 50 millisecond delay on each side individually provided it's in the micro pitch mode.
I will say it's the fattest spread I've ever gotten without sounding overly washed out, Speaking of using the old 910's and 949's I've never had the privilege to try any of the digital units such as the H3000 or current Eclipse that are suppose to have what the old units do and then some!

Guitarjb
Senior Member
Posts: 599
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 3:35 am

Post by Guitarjb » Wed May 28, 2008 11:08 am

zak wrote:the eventide takes the gtr signal. splits it into L/R.
the left side is pitch shifted down -9 cents and delayed 5ms
the right side is pitch shifted up +9 cents and delayed 25ms.
this is then mixed back in with the dry guitar signal and placed across the stereo field. the result is a huge fat, "jangly" guitar tone.

most people on this board would probably hate it, but if you like the fair warning/1984 tone. you like the eventide.


Thanks for these details. Wow, amazing that I've been a fan of EVH for so long and I've never come across this before- have I been living under a rock?? Yup, I definitely like the Fair Warning and 1984 guitar tones, so like the Evantide sound. I did a little internet searching and found that the Eventide has been used on so many recordings by so many big-name acts/guitar players.

So I guess that is a main ingredient of why EVH and Steve Vai, among others, had such a fat and identifiable sound in the '80s.

Joe

User avatar
YHWH
Senior Member
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:10 pm
Contact:

Post by YHWH » Wed May 28, 2008 2:38 pm

... as far as digital FX go... the H910 is "ancient". It was first released in '75. That was used on VH #1 but primarily for the delay. The H949 came out in '80. It does the micro pitch shift like the late '80s H3000s. I believe the H949 is what Ed used live ('86-'88 Van Hagar-era) as well.

User avatar
rgalpin
Senior Member
Posts: 3668
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 10:08 am
Location: Washington, DC

Post by rgalpin » Wed May 28, 2008 4:24 pm

the 1984 album tone has a DI quality to it. like i can't hear the air in the room. like i can't feel a speaker working it's ass off.

anyone agree?

User avatar
guitar007
Senior Member
Posts: 1154
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 8:28 pm
Contact:

Post by guitar007 » Wed May 28, 2008 4:49 pm

I would agree with that.
~guitar007

User avatar
T.J.Fuller
Senior Member
Posts: 1256
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:25 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: now in Denver, CO
Contact:

Post by T.J.Fuller » Wed May 28, 2008 4:50 pm

you know what..he may have started using the Palmer DI units around this time.

interesting observation but, it does have that DI quality to it doesn't it?
"In search of World Class Tone"
Clips - http://www.soundclick.com/tjfuller" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.myspace.com/tjfullerproject" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Guitarjb
Senior Member
Posts: 599
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 3:35 am

Post by Guitarjb » Wed May 28, 2008 5:28 pm

YHWH wrote:... as far as digital FX go... the H910 is "ancient". It was first released in '75. That was used on VH #1 but primarily for the delay. The H949 came out in '80. It does the micro pitch shift like the late '80s H3000s. I believe the H949 is what Ed used live ('86-'88 Van Hagar-era) as well.


What songs or parts was the H910 used for on VH1? I always thought any effects or delay heard on the first few records was just Eddies stage gear setup: Pase 90, Flanger, Echoplex, etc...

Joe

User avatar
rgalpin
Senior Member
Posts: 3668
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 10:08 am
Location: Washington, DC

Post by rgalpin » Wed May 28, 2008 5:48 pm

i think the overdubbed solo at the end of Ice Cream Man has something that was put on it at the console that gives a slight chorus effect. maybe that's the H910?

User avatar
fivecoyote
Senior Member
Posts: 1419
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:28 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: NJ
Contact:

Post by fivecoyote » Thu May 29, 2008 10:44 am

rgalpin wrote:the 1984 album tone has a DI quality to it. like i can't hear the air in the room. like i can't feel a speaker working it's ass off.

anyone agree?
Absolutely. I remember getting that album, putting it on the stereo and listening w/ two of my friends who were not guit players. I was hugely disappointed in the guitar sound. It sounded like the amp wasn't cranked or something. No angry Marshall -- just tame. Still a great album, but not what I was hoping for tone-wise.
At it awhile, still learnin'

Get woodalicious tonology factoid learnin' at http://www.WOODYTONE.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;!

User avatar
rgalpin
Senior Member
Posts: 3668
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 10:08 am
Location: Washington, DC

Post by rgalpin » Thu May 29, 2008 10:53 am

fivecoyote wrote:
rgalpin wrote:the 1984 album tone has a DI quality to it. like i can't hear the air in the room. like i can't feel a speaker working it's ass off.

anyone agree?
Absolutely. I remember getting that album, putting it on the stereo and listening w/ two of my friends who were not guit players. I was hugely disappointed in the guitar sound. It sounded like the amp wasn't cranked or something. No angry Marshall -- just tame. Still a great album, but not what I was hoping for tone-wise.
and those electronic sounding toms and kick drum. Alex "TECHNO" Van Halen on the drum machine. :shock:

as someone who had followed their sound and general mojo closely from album to album, that was a weird one to get used to. but i had a weird time getting used to Fair Warning too. it seemed like there was no melody to the vocals.

User avatar
45auto
Senior Member
Posts: 2532
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 12:23 pm
Location: cowtown tx

Post by 45auto » Thu May 29, 2008 4:50 pm

i think somebody makes a tdm plug that attempts to do an eventide harmonizer. i wish i could find one for vst. i'd like to find a stereo delay+stereo detune/harmonizer that might be interesting
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default ... dID=559714" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://s62.photobucket.com/albums/h119/ ... t=1980.flv" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Post Reply