KT-77 vs. EL-34/6CA7

The good, the bad and the ugly.

Moderator: VelvetGeorge

Post Reply
User avatar
JD
Senior Member
Posts: 989
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 2:00 pm

KT-77 vs. EL-34/6CA7

Post by JD » Wed Feb 08, 2006 8:48 pm

Has anyone compared a true beam KT-77 tube with the standard EL-34?

From what I read, the KT-77 handles considerably more power (32W vs 25W) and has a much tighter sound, especially in the low frequencies, more like a KT-88 vs 6550 or KT-66 vs. 6L6.

Bob at Eurotubes has the new JJ KT-77s coming in a week or so. I'm looking forward to trying these out! Will these simply install with a bias adjustment and no other mods in an EL-34 equipped Marshall? Or is this a bad idea?

User avatar
novosibir
Senior Member
Posts: 4654
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:32 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Nuernberg, Germany
Contact:

Post by novosibir » Wed Feb 08, 2006 8:52 pm

The fault almost always is sitting in front of the amp :wink:

Larry's Website now with included Pix's Gallery

User avatar
JD
Senior Member
Posts: 989
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 2:00 pm

Post by JD » Wed Feb 08, 2006 9:39 pm

Thanks. I must have been sleeping, not sure how I missed that post.

I'm looking to get a bit more out of the bottom end vs. a standard EL-34 so maybe these will work well for me. I tried the EL-34Ls and while ok just a bit harsh on the mids and high end, for me anyway. I'd still prefer a standard EL-34 design. I'm really looking forward to trying these new JJs as they are the only current production KT-77, at least that I have found. Not sure where I'm going to bias them yet.

I'm warming up to the 6L6GC sound of the 5150 but just a bit too tight and clean for my tastes. Don't much care for the 6550s in Marshalls.

User avatar
novosibir
Senior Member
Posts: 4654
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:32 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Nuernberg, Germany
Contact:

Post by novosibir » Wed Feb 08, 2006 10:05 pm

JD wrote:I'm warming up to the 6L6GC sound of the 5150 but just a bit too tight and clean for my tastes.
A couple days ago I've supplied a customer's '91 SLO 100 with the new TungSol 12AX7's and a quad NOS Sylvania 6L6GC's, biased to 76% of the max. plate dissipation (no problem with Sylvanias)...

... the amp now is pure killer :o

Larry
The fault almost always is sitting in front of the amp :wink:

Larry's Website now with included Pix's Gallery

User avatar
JD
Senior Member
Posts: 989
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 2:00 pm

Post by JD » Wed Feb 08, 2006 10:34 pm

My only experience with the 6L6GCs is the 5150 and that amp is a monster. Way too much preamp gain on tap so you have to be careful, but with some patience it gives a nice big fat crunch. Pushing the power tubes with little preamp gain works well.

I have only played EL-34s and 6550s in Marshalls and definitely prefer the EL-34s. Sounds interesting to try a set of 6L6GCs, which is more or less what I was after with the KT-77s. How do the 2 compare in the same amp?

I know going from an EL-34 to 6550 can require a bias resistor change, otherwise its pretty much a straight swap, but going from an EL-34 to like a 5881 or 6L6GC requires more circuit changes. Are any amp wiring mods required to go from EL-34 to KT-77 (with the pin 1 not used) on a Marshall?

User avatar
killertone
Senior Member
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 1:55 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Post by killertone » Thu Feb 09, 2006 3:58 pm

JD wrote: I know going from an EL-34 to 6550 can require a bias resistor change, otherwise its pretty much a straight swap, but going from an EL-34 to like a 5881 or 6L6GC requires more circuit changes. Are any amp wiring mods required to go from EL-34 to KT-77 (with the pin 1 not used) on a Marshall?
There should be no mod necessary. KT77's will actually take a little higher plate voltage I believe so all should be well and good to go from 34's to KT77's.

Post Reply