Tung-Sol 6550s in a Super Lead

The good, the bad and the ugly.

Moderator: VelvetGeorge

Post Reply
shakti
Senior Member
Posts: 2053
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 9:06 am
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Ramnes, Norway

Tung-Sol 6550s in a Super Lead

Post by shakti » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:06 am

I'm currently building a '69-style SL, and I want to try it with 6550 tubes.

- does a Tung-Sol 6500 (original 50s-60s production) fit in a 69 SL? With the rotated output transformer and large envelope of the "coke bottles", I am a little worried that there's not enough clearance? Anyone tried this?

- do I *have* to change the 220k bias splitters to a lower value? Some say 150k, some say even lower. How do EL34s sound with a lower value resistor? Hiwatts have 100k, yet use EL34s... Looking for a BOG type sound.
JTM45 RS OT, 1973 18W, JTM45/100, JTM50, JMP50 1986, JMP100 "West Coast", AC15, AC30, BF Super Reverb, Boogie Mk 1, Hiwatt CP103, DR103

shakti
Senior Member
Posts: 2053
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 9:06 am
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Ramnes, Norway

Re: Tung-Sol 6550s in a Super Lead

Post by shakti » Sat Feb 08, 2014 1:38 pm

Anyone?
JTM45 RS OT, 1973 18W, JTM45/100, JTM50, JMP50 1986, JMP100 "West Coast", AC15, AC30, BF Super Reverb, Boogie Mk 1, Hiwatt CP103, DR103

User avatar
chrisom
Senior Member
Posts: 1351
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 9:04 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: A Free Republic?

Re: Tung-Sol 6550s in a Super Lead

Post by chrisom » Sat Feb 08, 2014 2:06 pm

Didn't Robin Trower use 6550's in his old Marshalls? Tuned his Strat down a whole step and used a pedal with it? Sounded GREAT... :thumbsup:

shakti
Senior Member
Posts: 2053
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 9:06 am
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Ramnes, Norway

Re: Tung-Sol 6550s in a Super Lead

Post by shakti » Sat Feb 08, 2014 2:11 pm

Never heard about that, but I love his sound as well, so that works for me!

I have a 12-series already and am currently building a 69 SL. I'll probably set up one with EL34s and one with 6550s, just don't know which tubes in which one.
JTM45 RS OT, 1973 18W, JTM45/100, JTM50, JMP50 1986, JMP100 "West Coast", AC15, AC30, BF Super Reverb, Boogie Mk 1, Hiwatt CP103, DR103

harddriver
Senior Member
Posts: 1673
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 8:28 pm
Location: chicago, IL

Re: Tung-Sol 6550s in a Super Lead

Post by harddriver » Mon Feb 10, 2014 6:55 pm

Should be plenty of room for them I would think. Yes you need to change the bias splitters to at least 150K, I run 82K in my 6550 amps but 150K works just fine and you will have to increase - bias in the bias circuit as well.

catalin gramada
Senior Member
Posts: 182
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 1:54 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: everywhere in Europe

Re: Tung-Sol 6550s in a Super Lead

Post by catalin gramada » Tue Feb 11, 2014 4:00 am

shakti wrote:I'm currently building a '69-style SL, and I want to try it with 6550 tubes.

- does a Tung-Sol 6500 (original 50s-60s production) fit in a 69 SL? With the rotated output transformer and large envelope of the "coke bottles", I am a little worried that there's not enough clearance? Anyone tried this?

- do I *have* to change the 220k bias splitters to a lower value? Some say 150k, some say even lower. How do EL34s sound with a lower value resistor? Hiwatts have 100k, yet use EL34s... Looking for a BOG type sound.

Hi
have no ideea how those 6550 sound, but changing values of resistors have less in common with the power tubes in terms of sound but more for proper functioning of power tubes.
In terms of sound those resistors have major impact for PI tube cause you will modify the load "seen" by PI tube. lowering will have as consequences less gain (due to less amplification)/early brek-up-less headroom (due to reduced voltage swing)and of course you will have less bass reponse cause the time constant will be modified if you keep the same caps in circuit. "less"doesn't have any depreciative conotation just to be very clear the sound will be changed once you change those resistors over the particularity of any power tube you decide to use.
And yes , you will need to lower in value.100k or less is relative safe for those tube,but can choose 150k as well for the tone -as Marshall used-for tone consideration. Hope this help
Catalin
Last edited by catalin gramada on Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Catalin

User avatar
ezs
Senior Member
Posts: 337
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 12:37 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Seattle

Re: Tung-Sol 6550s in a Super Lead

Post by ezs » Tue Feb 11, 2014 5:28 pm

Tung Sol RI 6550's worst tone 6550 ever. I had 4 quads. suck, thin, no lows compared to Sovtek or SED, even Svetlana. 2 of them ended up having vacuum leaks too and turned white in a matter of 2 gigs. My 2 cents.

yladrd61
Senior Member
Posts: 256
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:03 am
Just the numbers in order: 7

Re: Tung-Sol 6550s in a Super Lead

Post by yladrd61 » Fri Mar 07, 2014 4:08 pm

Try the TAD 6550A I just put them in a JMP 2203 and they sound great :jimi:

Post Reply