Measuring Attenuator Impedance - Weber Mass 150 Paralleled
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:14 pm
I have a Weber MASS 150. I want to run it IN PARALLEL with my 4x12 cab so that the amp thinks it's seeing 2 cabs. I need to make the cab match the impedance of the attenuator.
The problem is that it is unclear on Weber's site what the impedance of the unit is.
https://taweber.powweb.com/weber/mass150.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"MASS with 150 watt rating. 8 ohms. May be used on 4, 8, and 16 ohm amplifiers." Additional info on this I found says this:
http://www.mylespaul.com/forums/1533453-post15.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Well, technically it is "impedance swamped" which allows you to use it with really any impedance cab and speaker. It is a resistor network Ted devised..."
I(found on forums at freestompboxes.org):
"At different levels of attenuation, you will get different impedances depending on the ratio of the impedance of the attenuator in tandem with the impedance of the speaker plugged into it. This sort of attenuator will never give you an exact impedance match. They say that you can use it with 4, 8, or 16 ohm amps because most tube amps can tolerate impedance mismatches as long as they're not too far off. Using a 16 ohm speaker with the Mass Lite could potentially get you a range of impedances anywhere from 8 to 24 ohms, depending on the level of attenuation and the setting of the "Range" switch. This should be okay for a 16 ohm amp, but you have to be aware that mismatching the impedance will change the tone and response of the amp from its "normal" sound."
SO.......
Because of the confusion, I would like to simply measure the impedance of the unit myself with a multi-meter.
Here is what I did:
I plugged a speaker cable into the INPUT of the attenuator. I measured the ohms across the tip and the sleeve of the cable. It reads 27 ohms. Is that the impedance the amp will see if I set the attenuator to FULL LOAD?
Is there more to it than that?
FYI - the 27 ohm reading is NOT affected by changing the level of attenuation on the attenuator. Don't know if that helps explain what's going on or not...
Thanks for your help on this - looking forward to some insight... (READ: chomping at the bit to try hooking it up this way!!)
-Rob
The problem is that it is unclear on Weber's site what the impedance of the unit is.
https://taweber.powweb.com/weber/mass150.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"MASS with 150 watt rating. 8 ohms. May be used on 4, 8, and 16 ohm amplifiers." Additional info on this I found says this:
http://www.mylespaul.com/forums/1533453-post15.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Well, technically it is "impedance swamped" which allows you to use it with really any impedance cab and speaker. It is a resistor network Ted devised..."
I(found on forums at freestompboxes.org):
"At different levels of attenuation, you will get different impedances depending on the ratio of the impedance of the attenuator in tandem with the impedance of the speaker plugged into it. This sort of attenuator will never give you an exact impedance match. They say that you can use it with 4, 8, or 16 ohm amps because most tube amps can tolerate impedance mismatches as long as they're not too far off. Using a 16 ohm speaker with the Mass Lite could potentially get you a range of impedances anywhere from 8 to 24 ohms, depending on the level of attenuation and the setting of the "Range" switch. This should be okay for a 16 ohm amp, but you have to be aware that mismatching the impedance will change the tone and response of the amp from its "normal" sound."
SO.......
Because of the confusion, I would like to simply measure the impedance of the unit myself with a multi-meter.
Here is what I did:
I plugged a speaker cable into the INPUT of the attenuator. I measured the ohms across the tip and the sleeve of the cable. It reads 27 ohms. Is that the impedance the amp will see if I set the attenuator to FULL LOAD?
Is there more to it than that?
FYI - the 27 ohm reading is NOT affected by changing the level of attenuation on the attenuator. Don't know if that helps explain what's going on or not...
Thanks for your help on this - looking forward to some insight... (READ: chomping at the bit to try hooking it up this way!!)
-Rob