layout

Get support and show off your MetroAmp JTM 45 kit builds.

Moderator: VelvetGeorge

charles anthony
New Member
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:22 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7

layout

Post by charles anthony » Fri May 11, 2012 4:53 pm

Hello everyone, this place is awesome. I built a 45 kit from George awhile ago and love it. I used Larrys grounding and amp is real quiet. Does anyone know about changing the layout by moving resistors on board to lengthen plate and shorten grids of output tubes? I'm sure someone here has read the same book I did, but did you get hosed by same on a repair? Thanks to all and enjoy the weekend.

Reeltarded
Senior Member
Posts: 512
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:24 am
Just the numbers in order: 7

Re: layout

Post by Reeltarded » Sun May 13, 2012 3:22 pm

What happened?
not kicking the dead horse

charles anthony
New Member
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:22 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7

Re: layout

Post by charles anthony » Mon May 14, 2012 6:56 pm

I apoligize for the misunderstanding. What I am courious about is the layout of a 45. I built a kit awhile back and used Larry grounding . Everything is very quiet , I used 5.6k grid stoppers but there is still some of that presence hiss. I read in Gerald Weber's book about the larger chassis in the 45 vs 5f6a creating a problem with a longer run of grid wires. His suggested solution is to put the 220k grid return resistors on the top of the board and move the 82k and 100k on the bottom to shorten grid wires to output tubes and lengthen the plate wires. This is supposted to quiet things down. Anyone have any idea if this is worth doing ? Thanks for everything.

Reeltarded
Senior Member
Posts: 512
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:24 am
Just the numbers in order: 7

Re: layout

Post by Reeltarded » Mon May 14, 2012 10:35 pm

Oh oh I see.

Honestly, I am not sure about that. These things all hiss at volume. The best resistor choices on the front end will do that. Is the hiss worse than any other similar amp? When even my higher gain amps are hissing pretty loud, when you roll up the volume and hit a chord, everyone dives for cover. It's pretty negligable while playing.

I played 2 or 3 supers at volume for years. The hiss level on stage was like a waterfall on a mountain creek, but the volume would flatten that mountain when the drummer counted us in. Gerald kind of talks to talk.. Maybe he's right, I just don't know how much. Gainy amps hiss, no?
not kicking the dead horse

User avatar
neikeel
Senior Member
Posts: 7231
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Suffolk, England

Re: layout

Post by neikeel » Tue May 15, 2012 1:33 pm

charles anthony wrote:I apoligize for the misunderstanding. What I am courious about is the layout of a 45. I built a kit awhile back and used Larry grounding . Everything is very quiet , I used 5.6k grid stoppers but there is still some of that presence hiss. I read in Gerald Weber's book about the larger chassis in the 45 vs 5f6a creating a problem with a longer run of grid wires. His suggested solution is to put the 220k grid return resistors on the top of the board and move the 82k and 100k on the bottom to shorten grid wires to output tubes and lengthen the plate wires. This is supposted to quiet things down. Anyone have any idea if this is worth doing ? Thanks for everything.
Here is one a guy on PP posted, he did this mod:http://photobucket.com/jtm45 some other bad things too, I doubt that this solves the problem :roll:

In my experience hiss comes from gain in the early part of the pre-amp, so good quality resistors go a long way. Also if you have big bypass (bright) cap on the pot of lead channel you will be creating (or should it be liberating/selecting the hissing frequencies). You can tell this when you plug into a silent normal channel and turn up - no hiss, but plug into bright channel and turn up his++. To me this suggests that the noise is not generated in the grid wires of the PI output. Using the original layout has never been an issue for me. I use twisted wires and grid stoppers on the socket, that will usually block any unwanted transients anyway.
Neil

charles anthony
New Member
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:22 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7

Re: layout

Post by charles anthony » Tue May 15, 2012 5:49 pm

Thanks , I built my kit as per Georges instructions except for Larry's grounding and had some issues until I saw here the grid stoppers everyone installed. I cleaned up wiring in that area, mounted resistors and played around with presence pot wire. As you mention normal channel is silent....unless you either dime presence or raise bright volume. I was so proud and excited about this build/amp I'm just being crazy ! Gerald's idea seemed to make some sense , but I value the opinions offered here more. Overall I am super pleased with the 45 and sort of feel left out when it comes to mods. This thing rocks stock . Sometimes what you don't know does not hurt. Thanks again for the input. This place rules ,time to play some guitar.

User avatar
toner
Senior Member
Posts: 2582
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:57 pm
Location: Iowa

Re: layout

Post by toner » Tue May 15, 2012 5:56 pm

I can't imagine any significant hiss reduction by shortening power tube grid wires. As has been stated, most hiss is generated early in the preamp and amplified in the following stages.

While I'm not familiar with the specific remedy you mentioned, I would suggest taking most of what Gerald Weber says with a grain of salt, at least based on what I've read by him.

charles anthony
New Member
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:22 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7

Re: layout

Post by charles anthony » Tue May 15, 2012 7:22 pm

Yes, I do agree with you regarding Weber . But as I do not own a computer his books gave me something to read to satisfy my need to know. I found out the hard way from his repair service that it was time to go a different route regarding my quest to inform myself and this place has been a blessing. Building Georges kit was a great learning tool.... or a great excuse to own another amp !!

Coot Boy
Senior Member
Posts: 438
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 6:31 am
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Oz

Re: layout

Post by Coot Boy » Tue May 15, 2012 10:20 pm

charles anthony wrote: Overall I am super pleased with the 45 and sort of feel left out when it comes to mods.
While it's all well n good to know about mods ( and you'll probably pick up a few in time) IMHO the JTM 45 sounds best when stock with good parts.I even think the shuggy KT66s sound good. Put in some old stock pre amp tubes and yee the falk haa.

OnTheFritz
Senior Member
Posts: 1839
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:30 am
Location: Warren, Mi

Re: layout

Post by OnTheFritz » Tue May 15, 2012 11:44 pm

Coot Boy wrote:
charles anthony wrote: Overall I am super pleased with the 45 and sort of feel left out when it comes to mods.
While it's all well n good to know about mods ( and you'll probably pick up a few in time) IMHO the JTM 45 sounds best when stock with good parts.I even think the shuggy KT66s sound good. Put in some old stock pre amp tubes and yee the falk haa.
I concur, to nail the tone don't deviate from the benchmark. Good tone caps and pre's with the Shug's kill. :thumbsup:
"I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do. And for the people who like country music, denigrate means 'put down' " - Bob Newhart

Coot Boy
Senior Member
Posts: 438
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 6:31 am
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Oz

Re: layout

Post by Coot Boy » Wed May 16, 2012 12:25 am

OnTheFritz wrote:
Coot Boy wrote:
charles anthony wrote: Overall I am super pleased with the 45 and sort of feel left out when it comes to mods.
While it's all well n good to know about mods ( and you'll probably pick up a few in time) IMHO the JTM 45 sounds best when stock with good parts.I even think the shuggy KT66s sound good. Put in some old stock pre amp tubes and yee the falk haa.
I concur, to nail the tone don't deviate from the benchmark. Good tone caps and pre's with the Shug's kill. :thumbsup:
what he said :lol:

User avatar
BrianH
Senior Member
Posts: 912
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:14 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: layout

Post by BrianH » Sat May 19, 2012 8:47 am

I just switched from Shuguangs to Gold Lions and couldn't be happier. Gold Lions are smoother, less harsh on the top end, but have good grind.

charles anthony
New Member
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:22 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7

Re: layout

Post by charles anthony » Sat May 19, 2012 11:12 am

BrianH wrote:I just switched from Shuguangs to Gold Lions and couldn't be happier. Gold Lions are smoother, less harsh on the top end, but have good grind.
I have not had a chance to reply. Thanks for all the insight . I have a pair of tung sol 5881's from a old neighbor still in brand new orignal boxes I can't wait to try. I still think my build could use some more time to break in. I have had good luck with the valve art KT66's George sent with kit. I have tried some GE pre's I had laying around but, still have to select best ones from my stash. Honestly my build sounds so much cleaner than most clips posted here.....delicious none the less. It seems to flub out past 8 on bright volume. I cant stand pedals so I am happy with plugging straight in a staying a little cleaner.

User avatar
neikeel
Senior Member
Posts: 7231
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Suffolk, England

Re: layout

Post by neikeel » Sat May 19, 2012 11:35 am

charles anthony wrote:
BrianH wrote:I just switched from Shuguangs to Gold Lions and couldn't be happier. Gold Lions are smoother, less harsh on the top end, but have good grind.
I have not had a chance to reply. Thanks for all the insight . I have a pair of tung sol 5881's from a old neighbor still in brand new orignal boxes I can't wait to try. I still think my build could use some more time to break in. I have had good luck with the valve art KT66's George sent with kit. I have tried some GE pre's I had laying around but, still have to select best ones from my stash. Honestly my build sounds so much cleaner than most clips posted here.....delicious none the less. It seems to flub out past 8 on bright volume. I cant stand pedals so I am happy with plugging straight in a staying a little cleaner.
What OT did you use?
Neil

charles anthony
New Member
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:22 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7

Re: layout

Post by charles anthony » Sat May 19, 2012 1:16 pm

neikeel wrote:
charles anthony wrote:
BrianH wrote:I just switched from Shuguangs to Gold Lions and couldn't be happier. Gold Lions are smoother, less harsh on the top end, but have good grind.
I have not had a chance to reply. Thanks for all the insight . I have a pair of tung sol 5881's from a old neighbor still in brand new orignal boxes I can't wait to try. I still think my build could use some more time to break in. I have had good luck with the valve art KT66's George sent with kit. I have tried some GE pre's I had laying around but, still have to select best ones from my stash. Honestly my build sounds so much cleaner than most clips posted here.....delicious none the less. It seems to flub out past 8 on bright volume. I cant stand pedals so I am happy with plugging straight in a staying a little cleaner.
What OT did you use?
The stock Heyboer 784-103

Post Reply