I can't say anything about the old super 2's but i have a newer one from the 90's and it is not the same as the 1400.jnew wrote:I bought the Super 2 because I had read that it was almost exact to the 1400. But it has lots of highs, mids are good but lows are not much. It sounds great and has the perfect drive but the EQ slope doesn't sing to me. I've never tried the MM 1400 so I can't comment or accurately compare but I'm keeping my eye out. So far, the Duncan Custom still gets my vote. It's a muscle PAF to my ears.
Mighty mite named it vintage because dimarzio trademarked the term PAF and mighty mite had to call it something else.
They named it Vintage for classic PAF.
It is mighty mite's take on the dimarzio PAF for the neck with a 1300 or 1800.
The MM1400 is much like a hotter PAF tone and the super 2 is a high output DSD neck tone with like you said less bass and more treble and is nothing like a PAF tone. it has more output than the 1400.
When i compare them i am pretty convinced the super 2 and 1400 are not supposed to be the same.
The 1300/1400 set is the equivalent to the dimarzio DSD/PAF set that was so popular in the 70's.
As a matter of fact the 1400 is a lot like the old 70's cream dimarzio PAF i have but it is hotter and tighter,