Page 1 of 2

Marshall Artiste 50W Combo

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:57 pm
by Steve
You guys ever hear one before? The one I have some interest in is a 1973 or 1974. How do they compare to a stock 50 watt from that era.

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 3:42 pm
by tonejones
I can't speak on the comparisons, but in the reviews over at Harmony Central they speak of a very easy mod (clip the lead to one particular component) that is supposed to greatly improve the clean channel.

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 3:56 pm
by Billy Batz
Wasnt that Marshalls take on a Fender Twin type amp?

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 5:25 pm
by Flames1950
As unpopular as the Artistes are you'd think they'd be cheap though, wouldn't you? Hell no. I'd love to get my mitts on one for some serious modding but I can't justify that much cash for an amp I wanna gut.

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:51 am
by BashCoder
Bumping this thread because I have an opportunity to pick up a mint '71 Artiste head. What are the big differences between the Artiste and the other 50 watters of the day?

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 12:03 pm
by MacGaden
Night and day, unmodded. They are very much cleaner, but not in the full sparkling Fender way.

If you look at the schematic you

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:18 pm
by Flames1950
BashCoder wrote:Bumping this thread because I have an opportunity to pick up a mint '71 Artiste head. What are the big differences between the Artiste and the other 50 watters of the day?
Man, are you on an amp-buying spree or what???

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 2:02 pm
by BashCoder
Well, at $1,500 I can't say it's cheap that's for sure. How about the iron? Is the OT as good as the others from that era, or did they try something completely new for the Artiste series?

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 2:03 pm
by BashCoder
Flames1950 wrote:Man, are you on an amp-buying spree or what???
Dude - it's not healthy... I clearly have issues.

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 3:51 pm
by Flames1950
As far as I know the iron is the same.

I've always thought an Artiste would be a cool modding platform with its extra knobs and the same trannies. But at the price (for an amp no one cares much for) no way!!!! You'd think they'd be as cheap as silverface Fenders as much as everyone bitches about them!!!

link

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 5:40 pm
by jerrydyer
link to the auction please? :lol:

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 5:47 pm
by BashCoder
Not an auction, but send me your email address in a private message and I'll pass it along to the seller.

artiste

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 12:48 pm
by jerrydyer
are these decent investments? I have one I am thinking of buying. Thanx

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 1:11 pm
by BashCoder
As I researched them on the net, it seems this amp gets more catcalls than applause from the folks who buy Marshalls. Will they hold their value? Probably. There's always someone who will buy it from you. But will its value grow dynamically? Hard to say - that requires a critcal mass of folks wanting one in the future.

Of course, it depends on how much you pay for it!

artiste

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 1:16 pm
by jerrydyer
its 1500 including shipping from UK. To me, it looks worth it. the power section is the same, it has reverb I love reverb and its hand wired, transformers original etc. Respectable seller. I would plan on holding onto it for a long time. Probably play the hell out of it.