My Caswell #39,36,34 Tone on stock equipment.. clip inside!

Share your YouTube videos or upload your mp3's.

Moderators: VelvetGeorge, BUG

Kapo_Polenton
Senior Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:23 pm
Location: O-town Ontario, Canada

My Caswell #39,36,34 Tone on stock equipment.. clip inside!

Post by Kapo_Polenton » Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:44 am

Ok, so there is much debate about which mod was in the amp: 39? 36? 34? Who the hell knows. Having heard the mod and listened to the album for say 20+ years, I have often suggested as many of you have, that the magic was in the EQ and the mix because taht amp alone won't cut like it did on the album no matter how thin and high endy it sounds when you sit in front of the cab. So here I submit for your ears, a real quick recording of me doing Izzy and Slash. After some feedback (good call SDM!) , I really cranked the highs in order to get that "brittle" Caswell feeling from the recording. I didn't spend much time on the Izzy side so it is just filler though decent enough. The "Slash" side comes through on the right speaker like the original. Playing isn't the greatest but the "vibe" is there. I think it could use a tad more gain but comparing the isolated guitar tracks available on youtube, I think it is pretty darn close. I used the then isolated drum and vocal track as my backing so the guitars might be a tad too up front. The only thing that would be nice is some bass but i didn't go that far. Let me know what you think. I found a little trick with the EQ settings between what Slash said his settings on the amp were and what they probably did in the studio so I'll share that if you like what you hear. Kind of a nice way for people with stock gear to get the tone if you don't mod or don't want to pay for it.

Amp - JCM 800 with 6550 stock. Pream on 8, master 3 or so.
Dan electro Transparent overdrive with treb set at 2 o'clock and bass at 10. Gain is just 1/4 way up, level half way.
Alnico II in an epiphone Les Paul
The rest is at the board with an EQ plugin through cubase.

To download go here -- updated link: http://www.2shared.com/file/5373468/599 ... al-02.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Go to bottom of page to get it.

Post back with thoughts!
Last edited by Kapo_Polenton on Thu Apr 16, 2009 11:34 am, edited 4 times in total.

User avatar
bulatovic
Senior Member
Posts: 204
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 12:08 pm

Re: My Caswell #39,36,34 Tone on stock equipment.. clip inside!

Post by bulatovic » Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:12 pm

i often use 2shared.com it seems alrite...
also tried http://www.wikiupload.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and it worked fine
Metro'd Marshall 1979 Super Bass / '80 1960A G12H30 55Hz
1974x 18w Clone - Trinity/Ceriatone

2008 Gibson Les Paul 1958 VOS
2005 Fender Stratocaster

User avatar
bulatovic
Senior Member
Posts: 204
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 12:08 pm

Re: My Caswell #39,36,34 Tone on stock equipment.. clip inside!

Post by bulatovic » Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:51 pm

Yeh, it works!

REALLY NICE PLAYING!!! Well in my opinion there's a bit too much distortion in the tone, and it seems a bit on the thinner side - maybe due to the mic position?
Metro'd Marshall 1979 Super Bass / '80 1960A G12H30 55Hz
1974x 18w Clone - Trinity/Ceriatone

2008 Gibson Les Paul 1958 VOS
2005 Fender Stratocaster

Kapo_Polenton
Senior Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:23 pm
Location: O-town Ontario, Canada

Re: My Caswell #39,36,34 Tone on stock equipment.. clip inside!

Post by Kapo_Polenton » Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:59 pm

If you listen to the isolated guitar tracks you'll hear there is more distortion then you think on Slash's side. Izzy's side i used too much dirt though definitely. I used this as reference: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1-tRRvG ... L&index=34" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I could still get closer I think.I actually think it has to be that brittle and thin because when you add in the bass it rounds it out nicely like here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qU0gybzq ... L&index=42" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The guitars are a bit more in the background in the second clip but you can really hear Slash.

slashsound
Senior Member
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 11:44 am

Re: My Caswell #39,36,34 Tone on stock equipment.. clip inside!

Post by slashsound » Thu Apr 16, 2009 12:25 am

Kapo_Polenton wrote:If you listen to the isolated guitar tracks you'll hear there is more distortion then you think on Slash's side. Izzy's side i used too much dirt though definitely. I used this as reference: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1-tRRvG ... L&index=34" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I could still get closer I think.I actually think it has to be that brittle and thin because when you add in the bass it rounds it out nicely like here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qU0gybzq ... L&index=42" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The guitars are a bit more in the background in the second clip but you can really hear Slash.
When playing rythm i really cant tell who is who, do you know which is which, left side Im guessing is Slash and right side Izzy, but I may be wrong, do you know?

SDM
Senior Member
Posts: 1644
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:24 am
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: MI

Re: My Caswell #39,36,34 Tone on stock equipment.. clip inside!

Post by SDM » Thu Apr 16, 2009 12:32 am

Other way around. Slash rhythm is on the right. Izzy left.

Kapo_Polenton
Senior Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:23 pm
Location: O-town Ontario, Canada

Re: My Caswell #39,36,34 Tone on stock equipment.. clip inside!

Post by Kapo_Polenton » Thu Apr 16, 2009 9:13 am

What SDM said.. I changed my mix so that my Slash is also on the right side. You'll notice Izzy is a bit more upfront and Slash fills a wider spectrum on the right side in the background. I find anyway... Probably the use of close and ambience mic'ing vs. just close mic'ing for Izzy.

User avatar
chubs
Senior Member
Posts: 701
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:23 pm
Location: Near Ottawa, ON Canada

Re: My Caswell #39,36,34 Tone on stock equipment.. clip inside!

Post by chubs » Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:50 am

How did this guy on youtube those isolated guitar tracks?

User avatar
908ssp
Senior Member
Posts: 2954
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 12:56 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Michigan
Contact:

Re: My Caswell #39,36,34 Tone on stock equipment.. clip inside!

Post by 908ssp » Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:56 am

Won't download.

Kapo_Polenton
Senior Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:23 pm
Location: O-town Ontario, Canada

Re: My Caswell #39,36,34 Tone on stock equipment.. clip inside!

Post by Kapo_Polenton » Thu Apr 16, 2009 11:23 am

Crap.. any free upload server I try won't let me host it there long enough. It is getting annoyingTry this one:

http://www.2shared.com/file/5373468/599 ... al-02.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Go to bottom of page and get it there... hopefully.

Chubs, he used guitar hero I think.. one of those games that had access to the masters. Then there is a turn down option apparently. That is why the whole album can't be done because only certain songs are included.

Kapo_Polenton
Senior Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:23 pm
Location: O-town Ontario, Canada

Re: My Caswell #39,36,34 Tone on stock equipment.. clip inside!

Post by Kapo_Polenton » Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:03 pm

Let's get some opinions folks!

JimiB
New Member
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 1:40 am

Re: My Caswell #39,36,34 Tone on stock equipment.. clip inside!

Post by JimiB » Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:38 am

sounds really good - eq is slightly different - seems to be lacking mids. Maybe try it with a little more mids and a little les gain

Kapo_Polenton
Senior Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:23 pm
Location: O-town Ontario, Canada

Re: My Caswell #39,36,34 Tone on stock equipment.. clip inside!

Post by Kapo_Polenton » Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:58 am

I scooped it slightly too much I think.. the gain factor though i am not soo sure i would back off on because if you listen to Slash's side, he has quite a bit of hair there when he does the fills between the rythm. Izzy sounds like he has hardly any gain at all. Crazy how they recorded that but that is what makes it the masterpeice it is. Anyway not bad for stock gear! Get's me in the ballpark and goes to show the magic of EQ. I'd love to try one of those rack parametric eq's at some point.

User avatar
Grosh_Guitars
Senior Member
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:11 am
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: Longmont CO. by way of Southern CA.
Contact:

Re: My Caswell #39,36,34 Tone on stock equipment.. clip inside!

Post by Grosh_Guitars » Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:02 pm

Kapo_Polenton wrote:Ok, so there is much debate about which mod was in the amp: 39? 36? 34? Who the hell knows. Having heard the mod and listened to the album for say 20+ years, I have often suggested as many of you have, that the magic was in the EQ and the mix because taht amp alone won't cut like it did on the album no matter how thin and high endy it sounds when you sit in front of the cab.
I disagree. Having owned 3 of these amps back in the mid 80's my amps sounded exactly like the tone Slash got on AFD and also the tone Lynch got on ULK. The reason I had the mods done was because I read a interview with Lynch after ULK came out and I tried to contact Caswell at SIR only to find out he had left by that time and I was introduced to Frank Levi and proceeded with having him do the mods because he came highly recommended by the staff at SIR and was Warren DeMartini's amp tech. BTW Frank says he'll have a amp out by 2010.
Sound Clips: http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default ... tent=music" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Kapo_Polenton
Senior Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:23 pm
Location: O-town Ontario, Canada

Re: My Caswell #39,36,34 Tone on stock equipment.. clip inside!

Post by Kapo_Polenton » Fri Apr 17, 2009 10:06 pm

Fair enough, but would you say I am in the ballpark with my clip? I also assume that the mod Frank did is the same one you mentioned that did not involve drilling for an extra tube correct? So #34? (based on what folks have been saying in the other threads i suppose...)

Post Reply