The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.

Info for maintaining and tweaking your amp to perfection.

Moderator: VelvetGeorge

Post Reply
User avatar
bill bokey
Senior Member
Posts: 490
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:54 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: France
Contact:

Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.

Post by bill bokey » Fri Oct 03, 2014 8:30 am

It's exactly the same for 1959, 2203 or JTM45 :wink:

matttornado
Senior Member
Posts: 227
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:29 pm

Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.

Post by matttornado » Tue Nov 04, 2014 2:03 pm

Sorry but I don't have time to read through the thread but should I use a Linear or Log. pot?

I forget what I have in my amp now but once it gets to about 4, it stops getting louder & sounds the same all the way up to maxed.

Thanks

User avatar
novosibir
Senior Member
Posts: 4654
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:32 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Nuernberg, Germany
Contact:

Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.

Post by novosibir » Tue Nov 04, 2014 5:18 pm

matttornado wrote:Sorry but I don't have time to read through the thread but should I use a Linear or Log. pot?

I forget what I have in my amp now but once it gets to about 4, it stops getting louder & sounds the same all the way up to maxed.
You need LOG and presumably now you have a LIN

Larry
The fault almost always is sitting in front of the amp :wink:

Larry's Website now with included Pix's Gallery

matttornado
Senior Member
Posts: 227
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:29 pm

Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.

Post by matttornado » Wed Nov 05, 2014 7:47 am

Thank you, Larry! :)

din_mentor
New Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2014 10:38 am
Just the numbers in order: 13492

Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.

Post by din_mentor » Sat Nov 08, 2014 10:44 am

Hello MetroAmp Forum!

Totally new here, writing to you guys from sweden!
Im about to get myself my first plexi (used 1987 RI from -91) and so far i know 2 things about it:

1. i love the sound! :rock: :hairband: :jimi:
2. it's so f****n loud! :roll: :peace: :help:

so im gonna get the LarMar PPIMV installed by a professional amp tech.
i just want to ask, is there any good way of bypassing the PPIMV with a switch?
I ask just because even if i believe in this LarMar concept it would boost my own mind a bit if i could compare with PPIMV on max vol and without PPIMV in circuit.

User avatar
CoffeeTones
Senior Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 9:52 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: USA

Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.

Post by CoffeeTones » Tue Nov 11, 2014 10:41 am

The LarMar master has no effect on sound when adjusted fully clockwise. If installed correctly, there is no need for a switch. You could do it but there would be several runs of wire that may cause problems. Why not just do a before and after recording to satisfy the mind?

din_mentor
New Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2014 10:38 am
Just the numbers in order: 13492

Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.

Post by din_mentor » Wed Nov 12, 2014 5:49 am

Yeah i guess you are right :)
and i believe the PPIMV works just as good as all people has said here, i'll just have it installed and be happy.

BTW i read on Metros facebook page in a recent post that George uses type II PPIMV with the 500k dual pot because he thinks (hi George! :)) it is the best... that made made me a little confused since i hade just read this whoooole thread! (yeah when you're sick home from work, then thats what you do :mrgreen: )
link: https://www.facebook.com/MetropoulosAmp ... 37/?type=1

"My favorite master is the type II PPI-MV using the PEC dual 500k pot. Most transparent and even at lower volumes"

any comments on the 500k? i mean, you got me convinced about the 250k+2.2m but if George uses it then it must be good right? :D :oops:

Sounds good at least:

User avatar
CoffeeTones
Senior Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 9:52 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: USA

Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.

Post by CoffeeTones » Wed Nov 12, 2014 10:20 am

The 250k / 2.2M version is correct because when at max, you have a stock amp. It is also "type 2" but has the safety resistors in case the pot fails. George is good but Larry is better.

User avatar
novosibir
Senior Member
Posts: 4654
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:32 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Nuernberg, Germany
Contact:

Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.

Post by novosibir » Wed Nov 12, 2014 8:47 pm

CoffeeTones wrote:... is good but Larry is better.
Haha, thanks for the flowers :toast:

Larry
The fault almost always is sitting in front of the amp :wink:

Larry's Website now with included Pix's Gallery

matttornado
Senior Member
Posts: 227
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:29 pm

Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.

Post by matttornado » Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:26 pm

So would it be a waste of money to upgrade from a Alapha Pot to a Pec pot? I already have a 250K LOG alpha pot.
The only difference I can see would be durability. :scratch:

User avatar
CoffeeTones
Senior Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 9:52 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: USA

Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.

Post by CoffeeTones » Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:49 pm

Never had a problem with the Alpha pots, but I usually buy a few of them in order to find one that is closely balanced. Not that the matched pot makes a big difference, I just prefer it that way. It would be nice if the Alpha pot had a normal 3/8 thread & bushing.

The PEC pot would be a personal preference, IMO.

AndyK
Senior Member
Posts: 103
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 3:37 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: NJ

Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.

Post by AndyK » Sun Nov 30, 2014 6:55 pm

Is there a reason why George likes the Rich mv over the LarMar?

User avatar
neikeel
Senior Member
Posts: 7231
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Suffolk, England

Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.

Post by neikeel » Mon Dec 01, 2014 3:16 am

AndyK wrote:Is there a reason why George likes the Rich mv over the LarMar?
I guess you will have to ask him! The 'Rich Mod' does add a litle extra distortion of its own. I had it in a JMP50 and quite liked it, ideally I should try back to back.
Neil

Hank S
New Member
Posts: 43
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:24 pm
Location: Oakland Cali

Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.

Post by Hank S » Wed Jan 07, 2015 7:31 pm

I have a Tweed Bandmaster 5E7 amp that I am attempting to adda ppimv but I have no sound. Using the layout I assume (cough) that it should be the same as this: http://forum.metroamp.com/download/file.php?id=17637 But I get no sound. I stole the second speaker output for my pot location and I'm just not sure what is wrong. I removed the 220K and I'm going to pin 5 on V4 and V5. I even moved these to pin 4 because I thought that maybe they should be before the resister.

Is there something different about this amp that makes it not a good MV choice? I have put one in a Marshall before and went quite easily.
If it's too loud, your too old.

rockgod212
Senior Member
Posts: 1178
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:47 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.

Post by rockgod212 » Wed Jan 07, 2015 7:56 pm

well pin 4 would be part of your screen grid. so I think you have it wired wrong.
Hank S wrote:I have a Tweed Bandmaster 5E7 amp that I am attempting to adda ppimv but I have no sound. Using the layout I assume (cough) that it should be the same as this: http://forum.metroamp.com/download/file.php?id=17637 But I get no sound. I stole the second speaker output for my pot location and I'm just not sure what is wrong. I removed the 220K and I'm going to pin 5 on V4 and V5. I even moved these to pin 4 because I thought that maybe they should be before the resister.

Is there something different about this amp that makes it not a good MV choice? I have put one in a Marshall before and went quite easily.
"purple power rules"

Post Reply