
The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
Moderator: VelvetGeorge
- bill bokey
- Senior Member
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:54 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: France
- Contact:
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
It's exactly the same for 1959, 2203 or JTM45 

-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:29 pm
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
Sorry but I don't have time to read through the thread but should I use a Linear or Log. pot?
I forget what I have in my amp now but once it gets to about 4, it stops getting louder & sounds the same all the way up to maxed.
Thanks
I forget what I have in my amp now but once it gets to about 4, it stops getting louder & sounds the same all the way up to maxed.
Thanks
- novosibir
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4654
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:32 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Nuernberg, Germany
- Contact:
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
You need LOG and presumably now you have a LINmatttornado wrote:Sorry but I don't have time to read through the thread but should I use a Linear or Log. pot?
I forget what I have in my amp now but once it gets to about 4, it stops getting louder & sounds the same all the way up to maxed.
Larry
The fault almost always is sitting in front of the amp 
Larry's Website now with included Pix's Gallery

Larry's Website now with included Pix's Gallery
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:29 pm
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
Thank you, Larry! 

-
- New Member
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2014 10:38 am
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
Hello MetroAmp Forum!
Totally new here, writing to you guys from sweden!
Im about to get myself my first plexi (used 1987 RI from -91) and so far i know 2 things about it:
1. i love the sound!
2. it's so f****n loud!
so im gonna get the LarMar PPIMV installed by a professional amp tech.
i just want to ask, is there any good way of bypassing the PPIMV with a switch?
I ask just because even if i believe in this LarMar concept it would boost my own mind a bit if i could compare with PPIMV on max vol and without PPIMV in circuit.
Totally new here, writing to you guys from sweden!
Im about to get myself my first plexi (used 1987 RI from -91) and so far i know 2 things about it:
1. i love the sound!



2. it's so f****n loud!



so im gonna get the LarMar PPIMV installed by a professional amp tech.
i just want to ask, is there any good way of bypassing the PPIMV with a switch?
I ask just because even if i believe in this LarMar concept it would boost my own mind a bit if i could compare with PPIMV on max vol and without PPIMV in circuit.
- CoffeeTones
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1112
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 9:52 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: USA
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
The LarMar master has no effect on sound when adjusted fully clockwise. If installed correctly, there is no need for a switch. You could do it but there would be several runs of wire that may cause problems. Why not just do a before and after recording to satisfy the mind?
-
- New Member
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2014 10:38 am
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
Yeah i guess you are right 
and i believe the PPIMV works just as good as all people has said here, i'll just have it installed and be happy.
BTW i read on Metros facebook page in a recent post that George uses type II PPIMV with the 500k dual pot because he thinks (hi George!
) it is the best... that made made me a little confused since i hade just read this whoooole thread! (yeah when you're sick home from work, then thats what you do
)
link: https://www.facebook.com/MetropoulosAmp ... 37/?type=1
"My favorite master is the type II PPI-MV using the PEC dual 500k pot. Most transparent and even at lower volumes"
any comments on the 500k? i mean, you got me convinced about the 250k+2.2m but if George uses it then it must be good right?
Sounds good at least:

and i believe the PPIMV works just as good as all people has said here, i'll just have it installed and be happy.
BTW i read on Metros facebook page in a recent post that George uses type II PPIMV with the 500k dual pot because he thinks (hi George!


link: https://www.facebook.com/MetropoulosAmp ... 37/?type=1
"My favorite master is the type II PPI-MV using the PEC dual 500k pot. Most transparent and even at lower volumes"
any comments on the 500k? i mean, you got me convinced about the 250k+2.2m but if George uses it then it must be good right?


Sounds good at least:
- CoffeeTones
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1112
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 9:52 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: USA
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
The 250k / 2.2M version is correct because when at max, you have a stock amp. It is also "type 2" but has the safety resistors in case the pot fails. George is good but Larry is better.
- novosibir
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4654
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:32 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Nuernberg, Germany
- Contact:
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
Haha, thanks for the flowersCoffeeTones wrote:... is good but Larry is better.

Larry
The fault almost always is sitting in front of the amp 
Larry's Website now with included Pix's Gallery

Larry's Website now with included Pix's Gallery
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:29 pm
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
So would it be a waste of money to upgrade from a Alapha Pot to a Pec pot? I already have a 250K LOG alpha pot.
The only difference I can see would be durability.
The only difference I can see would be durability.

- CoffeeTones
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1112
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 9:52 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: USA
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
Never had a problem with the Alpha pots, but I usually buy a few of them in order to find one that is closely balanced. Not that the matched pot makes a big difference, I just prefer it that way. It would be nice if the Alpha pot had a normal 3/8 thread & bushing.
The PEC pot would be a personal preference, IMO.
The PEC pot would be a personal preference, IMO.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 3:37 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: NJ
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
Is there a reason why George likes the Rich mv over the LarMar?
- neikeel
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7231
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:31 am
- Location: Suffolk, England
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
I guess you will have to ask him! The 'Rich Mod' does add a litle extra distortion of its own. I had it in a JMP50 and quite liked it, ideally I should try back to back.AndyK wrote:Is there a reason why George likes the Rich mv over the LarMar?
Neil
-
- New Member
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:24 pm
- Location: Oakland Cali
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
I have a Tweed Bandmaster 5E7 amp that I am attempting to adda ppimv but I have no sound. Using the layout I assume (cough) that it should be the same as this: http://forum.metroamp.com/download/file.php?id=17637 But I get no sound. I stole the second speaker output for my pot location and I'm just not sure what is wrong. I removed the 220K and I'm going to pin 5 on V4 and V5. I even moved these to pin 4 because I thought that maybe they should be before the resister.
Is there something different about this amp that makes it not a good MV choice? I have put one in a Marshall before and went quite easily.
Is there something different about this amp that makes it not a good MV choice? I have put one in a Marshall before and went quite easily.
If it's too loud, your too old.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1178
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:47 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: U.S.A.
- Contact:
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
well pin 4 would be part of your screen grid. so I think you have it wired wrong.
Hank S wrote:I have a Tweed Bandmaster 5E7 amp that I am attempting to adda ppimv but I have no sound. Using the layout I assume (cough) that it should be the same as this: http://forum.metroamp.com/download/file.php?id=17637 But I get no sound. I stole the second speaker output for my pot location and I'm just not sure what is wrong. I removed the 220K and I'm going to pin 5 on V4 and V5. I even moved these to pin 4 because I thought that maybe they should be before the resister.
Is there something different about this amp that makes it not a good MV choice? I have put one in a Marshall before and went quite easily.
"purple power rules"