More 2204 Questions, this time power wiring
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2016 8:53 am
I'm back with more intriguing 2204 questions.
As you may know there are several diagrams floating about the internet most are very different in the power wiring stage so it made me wonder if any one is better over another in the following...
1). PT secondary > diodes > standby > 50+50 (both sides) > HT fuse.
2). PT secondary > standby > diodes > 50+50 (both sides) > HT fuse.
3). PT secondary > diodes > HT fuse > 50+50 (both sides) > standby.
4). PT secondary > diodes > 50+50m (both sides) > HT fuse > standby.
So is any one version better than the other? Should rectification happen before standby or after? Perhaps it matters not at all?
Thanks!
As you may know there are several diagrams floating about the internet most are very different in the power wiring stage so it made me wonder if any one is better over another in the following...
1). PT secondary > diodes > standby > 50+50 (both sides) > HT fuse.
2). PT secondary > standby > diodes > 50+50 (both sides) > HT fuse.
3). PT secondary > diodes > HT fuse > 50+50 (both sides) > standby.
4). PT secondary > diodes > 50+50m (both sides) > HT fuse > standby.
So is any one version better than the other? Should rectification happen before standby or after? Perhaps it matters not at all?
Thanks!