Page 1 of 1
For those of you with kids at home.......
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 8:26 pm
by Guitar Adjuster
You need to check this out, very scarry....
http://www.familywatchdog.us/
I have three living within a 5 mile radius of my house

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:55 am
by Wicksy
Yeah, i believe there are groups trying to get something like that over here in the UK. Sarah's law i think it is.
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:31 am
by mightymike
We had one diagonal, and one over, behind our house, but it wouldn't say specifically what he did, or if it was a female or male victim; just that they were underage. I confronted the POS one day, and he was a pretty big ugly bald fucker too. I told him I knew about him from the list, and asked him with a threatening

smile

to step foot on my property. He wouldn't. Smart Man.
Once news spread, (I printed his file a shared it with all my neighbors who have kids) he eventually moved out. He was in his late 30's early 40's living at home. I guess his Dad didn't like all the attention.
Good riddens AFAIK.
Since the Coral Rose Murder, North Port makes sex offenders check in once a month. They don't like it too much here anymore (boo hoo), and hopefully more will move away.
Good Riddens there too.
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:56 pm
by monsterwalley
Thanks for the link Guitar Adjuster!
I knew we had em but had no idea how many or how close!
I will definetely keep my eyes open! It just pisses me off to no end though, I don't want to keep our kids "sheltered" and turn them into "fraidy cats". I guess it's the world we live in now
On the other hand, when I read the local news briefs in our paper almost all sexual acts, molestation, whatever , were commited by a family member or "aquaintence. So WTF

.....
man it just makes me want smash shit!!!!
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:55 am
by zaphod777
I guess it's the world we live in now
The world was no different when we where kids.
Our parents just didnt have the info we have, and those types of things(depending upon your age) just were not "discussed." along with alot of other things people should have been talking about, hence alot more people got away with this type of cruelty.
In my state, at least at one point in time(it may have changed), anyone foolish enough to get drunk and moon someone(teenager, fratboy), OR any 18 year old kid(girl or boy) who happened to have a 17 year old girlfiend/boyfriend(and got caught), ended up on that list.
be sure, before you blacklist someone as a cruel sadistic animal.
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 12:36 pm
by mightymike
So true, although sometimes I wonder if when borderline people see these news reports of Abuse, they get turned on, fantasize about the news report, and then act on it, or worse---> get new Ideas from it.
That's why that Nancy Grace pisses me off.
She wouldn't stop asking Elisabeth Smart questions about the details
of her abuse, even though this young girl kept trying to tell her (over and over) that she was only there to promote her cause, which was to promote some organization that helps kids.
Nancy Grace wouldn't stop, and you could see that poor girl more getting upset, each time as Nancy drilled her with her cross examination type questions. She practically broke down and cried because of that insensitive helmut shaped head witch. (I could see her eyes welling up)
It took a lot for that girl to come on that show, and to show her face in public. And she didn't need to relive her abuse for Nancy Grace ratings.
(I hate that show. When my wife watches it, I leave the room.)
Then there was Oprah who was very similar with that boy that got abducted at the Bus stop.
They need to put the welfare of these kids above ratings.
We don't need the graphic details.
Usually the sex offender lists will usually indicate if the victim under 16.
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:58 pm
by zaphod777
And she didn't need to relive her abuse for Nancy Grace ratings.
(I hate that show. When my wife watches it, I leave the room.)
Then there was Oprah who was very similar with that boy that got abducted at the Bus stop.
They need to put the welfare of these kids above ratings.
We don't need the graphic details.
+ 1000