Ed's 1978 touring rig.

The man, the band, and everything else

Moderators: VelvetGeorge, RACKSYSTEMS

Post Reply
ROBIN L.
Senior Member
Posts: 147
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:14 am
Just the numbers in order: 7

Re: Ed's 1978 touring rig.

Post by ROBIN L. » Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:57 pm

Mr. Beasty wrote:
Good Guest wrote:
nitro wrote:I will question the alnico V vs alnico II magnet,alnico V or ceramic will do the job,im working with lindy fralin pickups(one of lindys techs im working with)to come up with a pickup that will end the story about alnico II magnets, and will achieve the van halen 1 sound,, we are working with alnico V and ceramic magnets,we are not even playing with alnico II magnets(waste of time for the van halen 1 sound, first album),ive been using the duncan 59 for a longtime and im very close to THAT sound using that pickup, but i feel we will(fralin pickups and myself)accomplish something amazing.STAY TUNE :D
It's already been done it's called the duncan custom (my fav for all things dutch)...
... or the Bareknuckle VH-II humbucker. :D or it's high output variante, the Steven Steven signature.
Good Guest wrote:... This I believe is where all the power soaks and attenuaters etc. fail in the EVH setup.
I agree, there is a little miracle happening in that box because with everything I tried, that set-up is never "plug n' play". Everything always comes out over bright and impossible to control.
It's funny you mention the Bareknuckles, because these are the ones I use in my Les Pauls.
The BK VHII (bridge pu ) sounds like the pu Ed was using in 1978, at least to my ears. It's an alnico V and 9.2 ohms resistance.
My other Les Paul is loaded with the BK Steve Stevens pu set, and they sound awsome through a plexi.
Tim Mills at BK pu's is a great guy and excellent advice.

User avatar
T.J.Fuller
Senior Member
Posts: 1256
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:25 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: now in Denver, CO
Contact:

Re: Ed's 1978 touring rig.

Post by T.J.Fuller » Sat Mar 14, 2009 4:00 pm

I'm hope I'm not getting off topic with some personal VH tone discoveries of my own.
I really think that the whole echoplex in series with the univox makes a lot of sense.and is extremely over looked.
josse posted those clips way back of Ed noddling on 1984 demo tracks and if you listen to them there is such grind, such clarity BUT that other missing element ....
tape saturation.
I've been doing a bunch of home recording with my new home recording setup.
and using a Marshall, Ep-3, EP-PRE and a univox and in addition using some tape saturation plug ins and I'm getting soooooo close to those Josse posted clips.
remember Ed's early sound was analog not that thinned out Dokken sounding digital stuff.
God this info is great stuff on this thread!
"In search of World Class Tone"
Clips - http://www.soundclick.com/tjfuller" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.myspace.com/tjfullerproject" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

ROBIN L.
Senior Member
Posts: 147
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:14 am
Just the numbers in order: 7

Re: Ed's 1978 touring rig.

Post by ROBIN L. » Sat Mar 14, 2009 4:01 pm

dirtycooter wrote:I know what I want for Christmas 2009 :shock: 8)

A Rockstah Plexi with a twist

It'll be a 50watt plexi with a variac and internal load with an internal line out inside to a 2nd full 100 watt power section with a second set of controls like the 2nd amp had and another line out to feed my wet dry rig setup too 8)

It'll be the biggest and heaviest head ever made.


And I don't care if its 3 Zillion lbs and three stories high 8) :lol:

Can you get all that in one box Mark???? How about a crate? Or a 10 space rack mount with two plexi faceplates on the front as well as a variac knob and meter and line out level knobs :shock:
I bet I coud come up with the chassis for it :D

Back to bein serious though-Robin, do you remember how the echoplexes were set or what settings he used?? Did they cascade into each other?? These were in front of the main amp input or in between the 1st and 2nd slave head??
In front of the main plexi.
One was set for a short subtle slap back effect, and the other was set for a louder echo with feedback.

ROBIN L.
Senior Member
Posts: 147
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:14 am
Just the numbers in order: 7

Re: Ed's 1978 touring rig.

Post by ROBIN L. » Sat Mar 14, 2009 4:03 pm

Mr. Beasty wrote:
ROBIN L. wrote: One of the Echoplexes was set for a short slapback echo and was on most of the time, while the other was set for a louder echo with feedback.
I always assumed the echo on the bootlegs was from the room/venues ... I will have to go listen again.

Robin, so from what you are saying there were two echoplexes AND two EC-80s in the signal chain at all times? :shock:
Only one Univox was in the signal chain. The other one was a backup and wasn't hooked up.

User avatar
45auto
Senior Member
Posts: 2532
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 12:23 pm
Location: cowtown tx

Re: Ed's 1978 touring rig.

Post by 45auto » Sat Mar 14, 2009 5:18 pm

i'm not gonna even say what we're all thinking... :? i had a couple of the univox echoes way back, but surprisingly, never owned an echoplex. don't they have adjustable input/output? volumes? if it was like you say with a couple in series, he had some definite preamp potential going. is there anything else you can tell us about the effects board? i just remember Ed saying it was just a plywood plank & everybody laughed at it until they heard him cut loose through it. i was always inspired by stuff like that!
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default ... dID=559714" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://s62.photobucket.com/albums/h119/ ... t=1980.flv" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

IloveMyMarshall
Senior Member
Posts: 1786
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:18 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Florida Sunshine State of Confusion

Re: Ed's 1978 touring rig.

Post by IloveMyMarshall » Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:01 pm

ROBIN L. wrote:
dirtycooter wrote:I know what I want for Christmas 2009 :shock: 8)

A Rockstah Plexi with a twist

It'll be a 50watt plexi with a variac and internal load with an internal line out inside to a 2nd full 100 watt power section with a second set of controls like the 2nd amp had and another line out to feed my wet dry rig setup too 8)

It'll be the biggest and heaviest head ever made.


And I don't care if its 3 Zillion lbs and three stories high 8) :lol:

Can you get all that in one box Mark???? How about a crate? Or a 10 space rack mount with two plexi faceplates on the front as well as a variac knob and meter and line out level knobs :shock:
I bet I coud come up with the chassis for it :D

Back to bein serious though-Robin, do you remember how the echoplexes were set or what settings he used?? Did they cascade into each other?? These were in front of the main amp input or in between the 1st and 2nd slave head??
In front of the main plexi.
One was set for a short subtle slap back effect, and the other was set for a louder echo with feedback.
So two delays set 110 ms and the other 300ms makes alot of sense and you def can hear it!

Guys stop the fighting I don't want to see this thread locked!
Metro 2204
Metro JTM 45/50
Next Super lead??
http://www.soundclick.com/ilovemymarshall" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

harddriver
Senior Member
Posts: 1673
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 8:28 pm
Location: chicago, IL

Re: Ed's 1978 touring rig.

Post by harddriver » Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:14 pm

So both echoplexes were carrying the guitar signal at all times with the echo bypassed except for the short slap back echo echoplex #1 that was on all the time and at the times where Ed wanted the longer echo from echoplex #2?

Is this correct?

User avatar
Good Guest
Senior Member
Posts: 2030
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:29 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Ed's 1978 touring rig.

Post by Good Guest » Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:31 pm

If two echoplexs are in series..it wouldn't matter if he had one or two on...2 would always be in bypass mode at the bare min.....we all know that an echoplex in bypass still must pass thru the fet boost , color and phase section. Therefore if all this is correct..the guitar is going thru 2 fets....ie boosting the boost, coloring the color and phase shifting the phaseshifted. Not one as many believe.

Boy now were really talking asymetrical clipping and boosting the signal. :mrgreen:

Well that info alone makes the thread a real gold mine ....what's that sound?..why it's good guest running to the lab breadboarding a couple fets in series.. :lol:

8) info

User avatar
T.J.Fuller
Senior Member
Posts: 1256
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:25 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: now in Denver, CO
Contact:

Re: Ed's 1978 touring rig.

Post by T.J.Fuller » Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:56 pm

a really good example of that second echoplex being kicked is that riff -late in the demo of Voodoo Queen , the riff that sounds like it was inspired by Jeff Beck's Led Boots- that slap back effect Ed gets almost sounds like it does when you record with latency issues while monitoring - I'm convinced it can only be had with 2 echo units in series. So it all is making more sense, when you hear a first hand account of Ed's signal chain- we could guess forever but it sure is nice to know for sure, what was really going on in the signal path.
Last edited by T.J.Fuller on Sat Mar 14, 2009 7:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"In search of World Class Tone"
Clips - http://www.soundclick.com/tjfuller" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.myspace.com/tjfullerproject" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Mr. Beasty
Senior Member
Posts: 675
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 8:19 pm

Re: Ed's 1978 touring rig.

Post by Mr. Beasty » Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:59 pm

T.J.Fuller wrote: if you listen to them there is such grind, such clarity BUT that other missing element .... tape saturation.
You think it is Tape Saturation? I'd would say it is the coloration from these pre-true bypass circuits. Two EPs and a EC-80 must "trash" your signal quite a bit.
http://www.fuzzymonsters.com
http://www.myspace.com/fuzzymonsters" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
T.J.Fuller
Senior Member
Posts: 1256
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:25 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: now in Denver, CO
Contact:

Re: Ed's 1978 touring rig.

Post by T.J.Fuller » Sat Mar 14, 2009 7:04 pm

since I dont own a plexi , I would say a bright sounding plexi would be warmed up with this chain just the right ammount - hence a browner sound.
I use this chain (JCM800-ep-3 -minus the 2nd EP-3 but using ClinchFX pedal-univox) and without the treble up around 7-8 is sounds flat, less dynamic.
but, warm and pretty damn good with treble up.
Last edited by T.J.Fuller on Sat Mar 14, 2009 7:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"In search of World Class Tone"
Clips - http://www.soundclick.com/tjfuller" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.myspace.com/tjfullerproject" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Mr. Beasty
Senior Member
Posts: 675
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 8:19 pm

Re: Ed's 1978 touring rig.

Post by Mr. Beasty » Sat Mar 14, 2009 7:07 pm

Good Guest wrote:Boy now were really talking asymetrical clipping and boosting the signal. :mrgreen:
Don't forget that sometimes there were GE-10s involved at that stage too ... this is very over the top IMO ... and possibly very noisy. You can't have this many pre-amps and long cables and not raise your noise floor. :shock: :?
T.J.Fuller wrote:since I dont own a plexi , I would say a bright sounding plexi would be warmed up with this chain just the right ammount - hence a browner sound.
I think we all accessed that the slaving into a second head makes for an very over bright sound that requires a lot of EQ-ing ... well, if you put two EPs and a EC-80 and long cables in between, that should take care of a lot of highs.
http://www.fuzzymonsters.com
http://www.myspace.com/fuzzymonsters" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

harddriver
Senior Member
Posts: 1673
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 8:28 pm
Location: chicago, IL

Re: Ed's 1978 touring rig.

Post by harddriver » Sat Mar 14, 2009 7:35 pm

T.J.Fuller wrote:a really good example of that second echoplex being kicked is that riff -late in the demo of Voodoo Queen , the riff that sounds like it was inspired by Jeff Beck's Led Boots- that slap back effect Ed gets almost sounds like it does when you record with latency issues while monitoring - I'm convinced it can only be had with 2 echo units in series. So it all is making more sense, when you hear a first hand account of Ed's signal chain- we could guess forever but it sure is nice to know for sure, what was really going on in the signal path.
The EP-3 preamp circuit is a high output impedance and with a long high capacitance cables will roll top end treble off.

TJ You were the first to theorize the two echoplexes in series, I remember you stating so with you EP-3 and EP-PRE.

I just tried my two EP-PRE's in series and there is more noticeable gain boost with two, and like Good Guest says the inherent phase shift of the two EP-PRE's which is quite unique. :mrgreen:

I'm sure Ed found the extra boost by trial and error just by wanting two separate ms duration echoes.

blfrd
Senior Member
Posts: 973
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 11:17 am
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Midwest

Re: Ed's 1978 touring rig.

Post by blfrd » Sat Mar 14, 2009 8:17 pm

Thank you very much for posting this information.

What was the ohm load setting on the 1st amp and what was the ohm load setting on the 2nd amp?

I've heard he preferred the 8 ohm setting, even though a single cab would've been 16 ohms.

But as we all know, this type of mismatch is common (Eric Johnson does this).
If there's no quiet, there can be no loud.

dirtycooter
Senior Member
Posts: 2923
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 3:02 pm

Re: Ed's 1978 touring rig.

Post by dirtycooter » Sat Mar 14, 2009 9:08 pm

Cool about the echoplexes 8)

I always have good luck with a real short 1 repeat at about 120-140 ms only.
Good fattening of the main sound here but very subtle.

Or then add something like a two tap with the first tap set 130ms and the second tap at about 300-350 ms for more echoey stuff and I guess this explains it. The two tap sorta acts like those two plexes in series then in a way. This gives that longer type of echoes I always hear but it gives a depth you cannot get with just one delay plus the first slap back sound is also in there too the whole time.

And I have found it is harder to get it going completely wet in the wet cabs and switch between the two sounds-slap only, then slap and longer-harder to set up levels going this rout then how Ed just did going all in series with 30% mix knob slap occassionally running into longer settings set at 50% or 1-1 ratio of mix for the second.
For wet dry rigs and 100% wet in that wet cab is tougher to cop when you think about it and one has to really use strategy to approximate this series set-up ED used.
So I find it intriguing this monster tone on VH1 was not the perfect wet dry "dry tone preserving rig" he later used and was really all mixed and pushed mono through one cab.
Its always hard to hear what is going on under all the reverb they added to VH1 exactly but it does give a tremendous spacious effect to the tone.

Yeah-the Ohm setting is a good question-so it was 8 ohm on the head into 16 ohm cabs????

Post Reply