Bridge rectifier vs diodes?

Info for maintaining and tweaking your amp to perfection.

Moderator: VelvetGeorge

Post Reply
shakti
Senior Member
Posts: 2053
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 9:06 am
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Ramnes, Norway

Bridge rectifier vs diodes?

Post by shakti » Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:58 am

I'm not very knowledgeable about rectifier circuits, so if this question is answered better by a reference to some online tutorial, feel free to guide me in that direction.

I was wondering if there's a technical difference between a bridge rectifier, like the one used in Metroamp's 50W kits, and a setup using diodes. Many early ('67-'68) 50W amps simply had diodes soldered directly to the power transformer HT leads. Probably not a very safe way of doing it, but I was wondering if there are any technical advantages or disadvantages with one method of (solid state) rectification over the other, and how that could translate to a difference in sound or feel. Would it be better to use diode rectification with FREDs, or is the bridge rectifier superior...? This is what I'm getting at...
JTM45 RS OT, 1973 18W, JTM45/100, JTM50, JMP50 1986, JMP100 "West Coast", AC15, AC30, BF Super Reverb, Boogie Mk 1, Hiwatt CP103, DR103

jcmjmp
Senior Member
Posts: 724
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 9:48 am
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Quebec, Canada

Re: Bridge rectifier vs diodes?

Post by jcmjmp » Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:01 am

A bridge rectifier is a single package version of a 4 individual diode rectifier and is usually setup for a single tap (no center tap) voltage source from the PT (vs center tapped output).
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hb ... ectbr2.gif" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

A standard bridge rectifier cannot be used with a center tapped PT i.e.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hb ... ectct2.gif" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Well, you could use it but it would be a waste of space and money because you'd be using half of it. I've never done it but I guess it could be done.


Electronically, there is no difference. With individual diodes, you have more flexibility and as you say, you can experiment with fred or fast recovery diodes.

User avatar
neikeel
Senior Member
Posts: 7231
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Suffolk, England

Re: Bridge rectifier vs diodes?

Post by neikeel » Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:35 am

My understanding is that the 100w amps use a bridge type rectifier with the voltage doubler type circuit.
Image
Here you need the 4 diodes. The PT does have a centre tap but that is run to a point between the first two filter caps to even out the voltages across caps which are of variable (+/- 10% values).
Exception is the JTM45/100 which has 3 diodes pretty much as the 50watter arrangement:
Image

In a 50 watt most amps use the 1A rated diodes but in series pairs for each half of the PT, the centre tap on this is to chassis earth.
Image

On the amps with the diode block you are only actually using two of the diodes (the fourth terminal that is earthed on a 100watter is left unused see below).
http://amparchives.com/album/Marshall/5 ... 85a_3.html

I personally would use the 3A rated diodes in pairs on a new build 50watter for a safety margin.

There are probably more erudite opinions around and I sit back for them to pour forth :wink:
Neil

User avatar
flemingmras
Senior Member
Posts: 2532
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:39 am
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Contact:

Re: Bridge rectifier vs diodes?

Post by flemingmras » Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:54 pm

IMHO, in the case of solid state rectifiers you're not gonna hear a tonal difference between different rectifier circuits. It's not even an area of the amp worth screwing with. Rectifiers either work or they don't, plain and simple.

In regards to the "voltage doubler" circuit...that as has been said before is a matter of semantics. If you look at it as if you're doubling the center tap voltage, then yeah you could say it's a voltage doubler. But hooking up across the full winding without the center tap connected will give you the same end result, but you'll have to install bleeder resistors across the first stage filter caps to keep the voltage on the caps balanced. This circuit is more of a full wave voltage balancer as it is used to allow each half of the HT secondary to charge the first filter caps instead of using bleeder resistors to do it. Since each half of the HT secondary is 1/2 the voltage of the full HT secondary, you get 1/2 the voltage on each cap and each cap on the first filtering stage sees the same voltage to prevent one from going overvoltage.

Now a note on voltage doubler circuits...all they are is a dual polarity rectifier with the negative supply output grounded instead of the 1/2 voltage point being the ground reference. This gives you the "peak to peak" value of the incoming AC (i.e. the voltage measured from the negative peak to the positive peak), which is double the "peak" value (the voltage measured from 0 volts to the positive peak on one side of the supply and the voltage measured from 0 volts to the negative peak on the other side), rather than just the "peak" value of both halves of the AC signal. This is how it "doubles" the voltage output. Since the filter caps are in series, just like with batteries you get double the voltage out since the positive peak charges 1 cap while the negative peak charges the other. Due to the way the cap is oriented in a positive fashion relative to ground, you get a positive voltage out of the cap that's charged by the negative peak.

Look in the MetroAmp Wiki in the Tube Amp Power Supplies section...I've written articles there covering the operation of each type of rectifier that you'll find in a tube amp. The link to the Rectifier Circuits section is posted below.

Rectifier Circuits

As was stated above, a bridge rectifier is a self contained unit with 4 diodes hooked up in a bridge configuration and will perform the same as hooking up 4 individual diodes in a bridge config, just like the 100 watt Marshalls.
There's just that fine line between stupid and clever - Nigel Tufnel

shakti
Senior Member
Posts: 2053
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 9:06 am
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Ramnes, Norway

Re: Bridge rectifier vs diodes?

Post by shakti » Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:38 pm

Thanks guys! The answer is usually closer to home than you think...I should spend more time on the Wiki!

Just one thing; some of you say the rectifier isn't worth poring over, yet some people say that using FREDs will have an effect particularly on the high end. I'm ready to believe that changes in the power amp section will affect the overall sound and feel (witness the difference between different filter cap brands, let alone ratings), but as far as the rectifier, I've never done any experimentation. I did have a tech install FREDs in a '71 1986 years ago. The amp came back sounding fantastic, but I changed tubes in the same operation, so that's not much to base any opinion on...
JTM45 RS OT, 1973 18W, JTM45/100, JTM50, JMP50 1986, JMP100 "West Coast", AC15, AC30, BF Super Reverb, Boogie Mk 1, Hiwatt CP103, DR103

User avatar
flemingmras
Senior Member
Posts: 2532
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:39 am
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Contact:

Re: Bridge rectifier vs diodes?

Post by flemingmras » Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:50 pm

shakti wrote:Thanks guys! The answer is usually closer to home than you think...I should spend more time on the Wiki!

Just one thing; some of you say the rectifier isn't worth poring over, yet some people say that using FREDs will have an effect particularly on the high end. I'm ready to believe that changes in the power amp section will affect the overall sound and feel (witness the difference between different filter cap brands, let alone ratings), but as far as the rectifier, I've never done any experimentation. I did have a tech install FREDs in a '71 1986 years ago. The amp came back sounding fantastic, but I changed tubes in the same operation, so that's not much to base any opinion on...
And the same people who claim the FRED diodes make any difference are probably the same guys who claim that Monster brand speaker cable is the best sounding speaker cable on the market...the same people who came from the audiophile/hi-fi community (i.e. "audiophools") at one time too. And some people claim to hear things they THINK they hear that they really don't...because when people listen for subtle things, they hear what they wanna hear...especially if they spent a lot of money on what it was they had changed on something. Helps them justify spending the large amount of money they just spent.

I never did understand why people try hi-fi tricks on guitar amps that were never meant to be a hi-fi amp, and wouldn't sound nearly as good if they were. The fact that they're far from hi-fi is what makes them what they are. Leave them imperfect like they are...that's why they sound as good as they do.

Filtering will affect the dynamic feel and tone of the amp..to a point. It depends on how much filtering the amp started out with. If it was a low filtered power supply to begin with, then increasing the filtering will have a dramatic effect. However, if the amp already has decent filtering and you step it up beyond that, you won't have as drastic of an effect. Eventually you reach the point of diminishing returns, and no amount of filtering increase will make a difference.

The filter circuit is the "current reservoir" of the amp...when you run the amp hard that has a low filtered power supply, there's not as much current in reserve for the tubes to pull, so the filter caps discharge quicker, causing the power supply voltage to drop. Some refer to this as "sag". But when you do it on an amp that has high filtering, there's more current stored by the filter caps, so the power supply voltage doesn't drop near as much. This affects the tightness of the amp. But again, once you reach the point where the filter circuit has sufficient filtering, you won't hardly notice a difference.

Here's another article in the Wiki regarding filter circuits, their components and what they do.

Filter Circuit Components
There's just that fine line between stupid and clever - Nigel Tufnel

paulster
Senior Member
Posts: 620
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 4:25 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Los Angeles & London

Re: Bridge rectifier vs diodes?

Post by paulster » Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:05 am

flemingmras wrote:IMHO, in the case of solid state rectifiers you're not gonna hear a tonal difference between different rectifier circuits. It's not even an area of the amp worth screwing with. Rectifiers either work or they don't, plain and simple.
There have actually been some comparisons and clips done here which, if you accept the comparison method, clearly show a difference between regular 1N4007s and fast recovery diodes.

These threads give a lot of useful information on what you might expect:
http://forum.metroamp.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=12141" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://forum.metroamp.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=14392" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://forum.metroamp.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=14053" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://forum.metroamp.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=8724" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I'll stick with my ultra-fast diodes, thanks.

jcmjmp
Senior Member
Posts: 724
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 9:48 am
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Quebec, Canada

Re: Bridge rectifier vs diodes?

Post by jcmjmp » Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:13 am

Regardless of the tonal benefits of having fast recovery diodes or FREDs, I believe that there are benefits in terms or spikes and switching noise going into the circuit and back into the PT.

Some say that snubber caps can have the same effect as a fast recovery diode.

Roe
Senior Member
Posts: 5056
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 1:36 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Drontheim. Norwegen
Contact:

Re: Bridge rectifier vs diodes?

Post by Roe » Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:09 pm

does the bridge rectifer george supplies in the 50w kit feature ultra fast diodes?
http://www.myspace.com/20bonesband" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.myspace.com/prostitutes" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Super 100 amps: 1202-119 & 1202-84
JTM45 RS OT JTM50 JMP50 1959/2203/34/39

paulster
Senior Member
Posts: 620
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 4:25 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Los Angeles & London

Re: Bridge rectifier vs diodes?

Post by paulster » Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:21 pm

Most bridge rectifier modules use generic 1N400x type specification diodes, but there are exceptions. You need to know the part number of the item in question and look up its specifications and/or data sheet to find out exactly what you're going to get.

I can't help you on the specifics of George's one, unfortunately.

User avatar
flemingmras
Senior Member
Posts: 2532
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:39 am
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Contact:

Re: Bridge rectifier vs diodes?

Post by flemingmras » Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:28 pm

paulster wrote:Most bridge rectifier modules use generic 1N400x type specification diodes, but there are exceptions. You need to know the part number of the item in question and look up its specifications and/or data sheet to find out exactly what you're going to get.

I can't help you on the specifics of George's one, unfortunately.
Most self-contained rectifiers are 4 regular standard diodes on a common substrate.
There's just that fine line between stupid and clever - Nigel Tufnel

User avatar
neikeel
Senior Member
Posts: 7231
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Suffolk, England

Re: Bridge rectifier vs diodes?

Post by neikeel » Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:45 pm

George's is pretty much the same, I asked him about their spec a while ago as I was concerned about the (or was it Flames :oops: ). He did say the spec was superior to the originals you see in the early 70s.
Neil

Post Reply