20 000 $ for this guitar !!!
do they provide the vaseline ! LOL
why should they stop ?
they always find some people to buy them !
sincerly, i think it's a rob !
as we all know, a guitar may look exactly like another one but might sound really different .
knowing they are unable to reproduce some decent pu's (although i didn't try teh BB1 & 2 but heard some clips to compare and had several guitars with classic 57 ) , i really wonder why it should cost 5 times or more , the price of a regular one ?
what do i care about a factory made signature of a rock star on a guitar even if i like him (unless maybe if he signs it in front of me on my own guitar if i was to met him) , will it make me play like him (nor will it make me sound exactly like him , better than with a regular prod guitar built the same way ) ?
no
the only signature guitars i bough were because of the particular spec i couldn't find on a guitar and i hated to have the signature or logo ( i had the angus young i had bought for the very thin neck and finaly sold it and had a mark knopfler as i could buy it new for half the price but i could have bought an american vintage if i had found one new as cheap ! anyway i sold it as well ! )
i think these repro guitars are just marketing and their prices are way too high for the tone they provide and teh fact they are just new guitars with a signature on !
would you pay 15000 $ to have Jeff sign your les paul 59 ri or any les paul (or any guitar ) ?
i wouldn't even pay that to get hendrix sign mine if it was possible whereas i love and respect him so much cause that's not something you have to pay !
have you already seen an artist asking you to pay him for he signs teh back of a record or a book , T-shirt ... ?
anyway, i don't think i would buy a guitar with wrap around bridge (especialy the new ones that can be bought with stop bar / abr-1) as i hate to play with a guitar that plays out of tune (that's why i can't listen or watch hendrix at woodstock or isle of wight anymore ! and you can see he's pissed off with that ! ) and most gibson i have tried are quiet sensible to that problem compared to strats or tele's , especialy the G string when you play a D near teh headstock , fretting the G string at the second fret , if teh intonation / saddles are not setup precisely , you can't be on tune mostly due to the height of the frets and the way you setup the strings height (unless you fret very softly), and it's quiet hard to be on tune on this string on the whole lenght of the neck (up and down ) at the same time (it needs a quiet precise setup for this one that you already have hard time , finding the right spot with an abr-1...) .
so i won't pay 20 000 $ to be out of tune ! LOL
that said that might be a nice guitar with teh right pu's for those who like wrap around bridges and can spend 20 000 not thinking it's a waste to put that much in that type of guitar !
by the way,; i have a 2002 wine red les paul standard , if someone is interested, i can sell him for 15000 $ and have a wrap aroound bridge mounted and BB's ! LOL
4000 $ or 5000$ is already a big amount of money but for a nice les paul 59' ri with nice top i don't think it's a rob but 20 000 $ for a les paul that is not even a flame top...
knowing the custom 57 price , i think this should sell for 2500 $ or 3000$ but not much more.
that's like buying a hendrix strat, even if some are nice, i find it a bit cheezy (and teh upside down body is uncomfortable ).
i think he would have played with left handed ones (and would have had nearly if not exactly the same tone ) if he could have find as much choice through the left handed ones but i suppose there was very few at that time.
the only real advantage might have been the way the trem arm was mounted (SRV must have thought that as well ! LOL) .