Why flame?

There's more to life than just amps?

Moderators: VelvetGeorge, BUG

Post Reply
rip
Senior Member
Posts: 567
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 1:14 am

Why flame?

Post by rip » Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:36 pm

I guess its just preference but does anyone else just like the plain tops for les pauls?

rip

User avatar
mwm523
Senior Member
Posts: 521
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:25 am
Location: Northern NJ

Re: Why flame?

Post by mwm523 » Mon Jun 22, 2009 11:10 pm

I LOVE plaintops. Here's my R8:

Image

And my next purchase will be a goldtop R4.

No flame needed!!!
-Mike

User avatar
jbzoso2002
Senior Member
Posts: 1089
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 12:01 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: NW Indiana

Re: Why flame?

Post by jbzoso2002 » Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:41 pm

I do like all Les Pauls, plain tops goldtops,
but nothing quite looks like a killer flametop!

Plus they all look a little different.

Jimmy 8)
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed

User avatar
BrianH
Senior Member
Posts: 912
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:14 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: Why flame?

Post by BrianH » Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:28 pm

I prefer plaintops, too :wink: '07 G0.

Image

User avatar
Scumback Speakers
Supporting Advertiser
Posts: 4517
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 11:27 am
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: Prescott, AZ
Contact:

Re: Why flame?

Post by Scumback Speakers » Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:12 am

I'm just a Les Paul whore...goldtop, flametop, faded top, black top, cherry top, I have them all.

Sort of sounds like that Eric Burdon song, huh?

"Drink the wine, get that girl...uh uh uh uh" :lol:
Scumback Speakers - Kick Ass Vintage Tone
sales@scumbackspeakers.com
http://www.scumbackspeakers.com
310-833-6632

rip
Senior Member
Posts: 567
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 1:14 am

Re: Why flame?

Post by rip » Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:09 pm

Sweet looking plain top there.

Yeah I wish companies put as much effect into finding good plain tops as they did with their flame or quilt tops.

Have you guys seen an ash top on a les paul? Wonder how it would sound.

Rip

Brad737
Senior Member
Posts: 584
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:15 am
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Cincinnati, OH

Re: Why flame?

Post by Brad737 » Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:04 pm

Well, I've certainly played quite a few awesome plaintops. But I just find flamed and quilted maple to be gorgeous. If I'm going to spend a lot of money for a guitar, I'm going to make sure it looks nice too.
Model citizen...Zero discipline

User avatar
yngwie308
Senior Member
Posts: 4623
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Valhalla, Arizona

Re: Why flame?

Post by yngwie308 » Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:56 pm

Southbay Ampworks wrote:I'm just a Les Paul whore...goldtop, flametop, faded top, black top, cherry top, I have them all.

Sort of sounds like that Eric Burdon song, huh?

"Drink the wine, get that girl...uh uh uh uh" :lol:
And an SG whore Jim..LOL, btw I heard Rick Normans G12-65's he got from you the other day and my future Scumbacks are the 65's 75hZ !!! Awesome!!
Dave
http://www.vintagewashburn.com/Electric ... evens.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.treblebooster.net/bolin.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
JimiJames
Senior Member
Posts: 3550
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 6:32 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: Why flame?

Post by JimiJames » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:59 am

Southbay Ampworks wrote:I'm just a Les Paul whore...goldtop, flametop, faded top, black top, cherry top, I have them all.

Sort of sounds like that Eric Burdon song, huh?

"Drink the wine, get that girl...uh uh uh uh" :lol:
+1
RIP Mark Abrahamian-rockstah -classmate/roommate
RIP Ben Wise -StuntDouble- comrade-in-arms

__________________________________________
Build'sClip'sVid's

Metal Handles
Senior Member
Posts: 255
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 2:52 pm
Location: St. Augustine, Florida

Re: Why flame?

Post by Metal Handles » Fri Sep 18, 2009 8:25 pm

I was thinking a lot about this just the other day. I sort of came to the realization that Duane Allman, Billy Gibbons and a bunch of other Les Paul slinging greats deserved nothing but the best. I mean really, Hotlanta and Pearly Gates fit those players like nothing else could. They just had to be FLAMEY!

On the other hand, if you suck and show off with an over the top flame monster, something just doesn't seem quite right to me. Please don't get me wrong. I'm not trying to bash any of you guys here, I have a brother-in-law (who is a terrific player) that had an amazing sounding 1960 plain top sunburst that was an absolutely killer guitar in every way. It fit him perfectly, but I still feel that there is a place for the flames.

So to sum it up, I don't think there is a "one is the only" kind of solution here. I think there a number of possible fits for both types.

By the way, I have a three piece goldtop and I can see the top piece has a really tight flamey piece of maple under the finish, so I have an example of the best of both worlds!

Jon W
Senior Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:19 pm
Location: Wrongmont Colorado

Re: Why flame?

Post by Jon W » Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:14 am

I used to really love the the flame tops...back when they were kinda rare. Then fender did the "photo-flame" and then there were a lot of real flame tops on everything under the sun (even if some are just a thin laminate), from PRS, Schecter, Gibson, Hondo....

I guess I just, sort of ODed on flame tops.

So now a nice vintage plane top in a cherry burst (the old cherry burst with less red), or sun burst, etc. just seems to do it for me.

That said, I'm a Les Paul whore, too...love 'em all.

stump
Senior Member
Posts: 240
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 10:39 pm
Location: Central Mass.

Re: Why flame?

Post by stump » Tue Oct 27, 2009 10:53 am

I like both. Here's my 2003 Classic Plain Top in Cinnamon Burst. Swapped out pickups and Tone Pros hardware.
Image

jerryjg
Senior Member
Posts: 169
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 1:22 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7

Re: Why flame?

Post by jerryjg » Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:56 pm

to convince yourself that a plain top is better than nice beuatiful modertaly flamed maple top ..well, go right ahead, but it shows a complete lack of taste IMO. Now those uber flamey tops, yeah, Id prefer a plain top. But theres nothing like a sweet moderatly flamed Maple top. That IS Les Paul, and if you think otherwise you are just Wrong..
It AINT "a matter of preference" as has been suggested. I think most civilised people would agree, and of course, the market value bears testament to this fact.;
Image
I CAME TO RAWK!

xlb3x
Senior Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 8:18 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Lake Lookout, NC

Re: Why flame?

Post by xlb3x » Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:31 am

I like the plain ones but I would rather have flame. Here is my 1994 R9. Not a great photo but you get the idea. Very 3D top.

Image

Post Reply