jj kt66's

The good, the bad and the ugly.

Moderator: VelvetGeorge

Post Reply
User avatar
HTH
Senior Member
Posts: 600
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 8:53 am
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Newcastle, UK
Contact:
Contact HTH

Re:

Post by HTH » Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:15 pm

Roe wrote:the problem with the tung-sols and possible the JJs is that they ain't real kt66s - the specs ain't right. the tung-sols seems to have borrowed from the 6l6s while the JJs might have borrowed from the kt88s
^ +1

the JJ KT66s look exactly like their KT88 - wouldn't be surprised if they were the same tube that was labelled according to what orders they have in (or VERY minor constructional changes).

can't go wrong with Shugang KT66s at the price they go for, great sounding tubes that I've had no problems with.
"If you can possibly manage the time, please play both sides at one meeting"

http://www.youtube.com/TeleCustom72" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Top
stevecham
New Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:37 am
Just the numbers in order: 7

Re: jj kt66's

Post by stevecham » Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:57 am

I too have ordered a pair of jj kt66s to try in my JTM45 and will let everyone know the results (compared to the stock Valve Arts).

Steve
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Tubes”