WOW... im really stuck.... im going to but one of these amps, but dont konw which way to go. I have played a jtm 45 a couple times at a local shop, and loved it, but am worried about 30W being enough power. 1987 i have not had a great deal of chances to play, but know that amp is pleanty loud.
are there large tone differences... does the 1987 sound as good as the 45?
Mike
1987 vs Jtm 45 (30w) tone
Moderator: VelvetGeorge
- guitarpjmike
- Senior Member
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 12:05 pm
Hi Mike,
I depends on what you like, honestly. If you like a fuller sound, then the JTM45 might feel more musical to you. Personally, I think a lot of music lives in the low mids - a lot of the gut feel, figuratively and literally. So I gravitate towards the more balanced, fuller-bodied sounds. Of course, you rarely hear me spending two minutes solid messing around around the 20th fret either, and I don't play VH-style rock.
The 45 has some "sag" because they use a tube rectifier, which to some people sounds like cool tube compression. To others it feels too soft.
If you like a tighter, more aggressive sound - one that's more midrangy and edgy, one that can cut over a loud band, you'll probably want to look towards the other circuits. Read the threads going on now in the 50W forum about the 50W/100W comparisons.
For me, the answer is easy: Build both! I built the 45 and the 45/100 first, but I have the other circuits ont the bench right now.
I depends on what you like, honestly. If you like a fuller sound, then the JTM45 might feel more musical to you. Personally, I think a lot of music lives in the low mids - a lot of the gut feel, figuratively and literally. So I gravitate towards the more balanced, fuller-bodied sounds. Of course, you rarely hear me spending two minutes solid messing around around the 20th fret either, and I don't play VH-style rock.
The 45 has some "sag" because they use a tube rectifier, which to some people sounds like cool tube compression. To others it feels too soft.
If you like a tighter, more aggressive sound - one that's more midrangy and edgy, one that can cut over a loud band, you'll probably want to look towards the other circuits. Read the threads going on now in the 50W forum about the 50W/100W comparisons.
For me, the answer is easy: Build both! I built the 45 and the 45/100 first, but I have the other circuits ont the bench right now.
- 908ssp
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2954
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 12:56 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Michigan
- Contact:
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 9:17 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
mike, we'd really need to have more info from you to make a suggestion. What kind of music do you play, who are your influences, etc. But to add to the above posters, you can think of the 45 and early 50's as being the same, except for 3 things (this is simplified a little) :
1)tube rectifier/diodes
2)Output tranny
3)Output tubes
Now those are three huge factors, and as a result, the two amps are quite different. If you can build your own, your options are greatly increased, as is your likelihood of getting an amp you like, and can easily tweek over the coming years. For example, i am currently doing a '67 style 50w crossed with a jtm-45 and will use a bit from each to suit my tastes. If you can't do this option, for lack of time etc, why not just grab that jtm-45 you mentioned playing. If it sounds good and inspries you, it Is good. End of story. I'm thinking back about 10 years ago when i played a 50w i loved and didn't buy it and still hear the tone in my head as if it was yesterday. In fact, i now recall two other times when i played a marshall in a store and regret not taking it home. I still can hear the tones and riffs i played on them. It's remarkable to recall actually.thanks. In any case, good luck with your choice(s)
1)tube rectifier/diodes
2)Output tranny
3)Output tubes
Now those are three huge factors, and as a result, the two amps are quite different. If you can build your own, your options are greatly increased, as is your likelihood of getting an amp you like, and can easily tweek over the coming years. For example, i am currently doing a '67 style 50w crossed with a jtm-45 and will use a bit from each to suit my tastes. If you can't do this option, for lack of time etc, why not just grab that jtm-45 you mentioned playing. If it sounds good and inspries you, it Is good. End of story. I'm thinking back about 10 years ago when i played a 50w i loved and didn't buy it and still hear the tone in my head as if it was yesterday. In fact, i now recall two other times when i played a marshall in a store and regret not taking it home. I still can hear the tones and riffs i played on them. It's remarkable to recall actually.thanks. In any case, good luck with your choice(s)
- Gunner
- Senior Member
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 3:39 am
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Sweden, Värmdö
- Contact:
I have both, a JMP 1987 (ptp converted) and a JTM45 Clone. I think they are the best. Both of them. I can't live/play without any of them. Before every rehearsal I'm standing in front of the amps and try to choose. The mood of the day decides.
One important question is also if you intend to play with distortion mainly from the amp? If so, there's some difference between a 1987 and a JTM45. I think BashCoder describes the sound and feel better then I can. I agree in every sense.
If you play with a rather clean sound from the amp, and get your distortion from a pedal, then you can choose either of this amps. I maybe would go for the JTM45 as it might be a little more useful. And the tube rectifier looks so cool...
How are you going to use your amp? A JTM45 with a 4x12 is loud enough for most situations. I play basic rock from the 70' at clubs and partys with up to a couple of hundred people in the audience. I can easily blow them of... And even my hard hitting drummer sometimes tells me it's rather loud. Then it is loud.
/G
One important question is also if you intend to play with distortion mainly from the amp? If so, there's some difference between a 1987 and a JTM45. I think BashCoder describes the sound and feel better then I can. I agree in every sense.
If you play with a rather clean sound from the amp, and get your distortion from a pedal, then you can choose either of this amps. I maybe would go for the JTM45 as it might be a little more useful. And the tube rectifier looks so cool...
How are you going to use your amp? A JTM45 with a 4x12 is loud enough for most situations. I play basic rock from the 70' at clubs and partys with up to a couple of hundred people in the audience. I can easily blow them of... And even my hard hitting drummer sometimes tells me it's rather loud. Then it is loud.
/G
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 8:36 am
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: paradise mid america, los angeles CA native
Hi I have both models as well and play classic rock and some fusion style rock ,the 45 is plenty loud and very sweet warm toned the 1987 has more edge and power ,once the 45 is turned up to about 7 or8 vol.its plenty loud . try them both .some of the posts before me really decribed the amps well. good luck,bluze
- Gunner
- Senior Member
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 3:39 am
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Sweden, Värmdö
- Contact: