The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
Moderator: VelvetGeorge
- CoffeeTones
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1112
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 9:52 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: USA
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
The 2.2M = safety resistors
5.6k are already there usually
You can re-use the green and orange wires twisted together for shielding or not, but would be better to use shielded wire.
5.6k are already there usually
You can re-use the green and orange wires twisted together for shielding or not, but would be better to use shielded wire.
-
- New Member
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 4:12 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
Will the 5.6k resistors be in a JTM45? If so, what do they look like? Do I just leave them where they are?
What would re-using & twisting the green & orange wires be used to shield? What do they shield? Where would this go? Is there a picture illustrating this setup?
Thanks!
What would re-using & twisting the green & orange wires be used to shield? What do they shield? Where would this go? Is there a picture illustrating this setup?
Thanks!
- CoffeeTones
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1112
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 9:52 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: USA
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
Not to be rude, but for your safety maybe you should have a tech do the mod. If you can't figure these simple things out, maybe you should not be messing around inside the amp. I will also add that if you do not discharge the amp, it could electrocute and kill you.
I will try to help, but don't want to lead you to injury.
I will try to help, but don't want to lead you to injury.
-
- New Member
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 2:59 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: Poland
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
Hi,
I've just finished my #34/#36 amp, and I consider mounting Lar/Mar PPIMV. I've one question about cables on pot. In metroamp wiki,
I can read, that if you are mounting PPIMV, you have to use RG174/U as your cable for mod. Is this really necessary to use this type of cable? I've asked for this in all electronics stores in my city - they say, that they don't have it in stock.
Regards
I've just finished my #34/#36 amp, and I consider mounting Lar/Mar PPIMV. I've one question about cables on pot. In metroamp wiki,
Code: Select all
http://metroamp.com/wiki/index.php/Lar/Mar_PPI-MV
Regards
DIY JCM800 2203, mod #34/#36
- neikeel
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7231
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:31 am
- Location: Suffolk, England
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
It is not mandatory, just that you have long wires with lots of signal passing through the middle of your pre-amp making cross talk and interference more likely. Using a decent shielded wire (not necessarily this type) is a good idea, you may get away with it, or notdjseban wrote:Hi,
I've just finished my #34/#36 amp, and I consider mounting Lar/Mar PPIMV. I've one question about cables on pot. In metroamp wiki,I can read, that if you are mounting PPIMV, you have to use RG174/U as your cable for mod. Is this really necessary to use this type of cable? I've asked for this in all electronics stores in my city - they say, that they don't have it in stock.Code: Select all
http://metroamp.com/wiki/index.php/Lar/Mar_PPI-MV
Regards

Neil
-
- New Member
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 2:59 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: Poland
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
Thanks for reply, I drilled a hole near impedance selector and mounted PPIMV. It's working perfectly, by first try, even without shielded cable.neikeel wrote:It is not mandatory, just that you have long wires with lots of signal passing through the middle of your pre-amp making cross talk and interference more likely. Using a decent shielded wire (not necessarily this type) is a good idea, you may get away with it, or notdjseban wrote:Hi,
I've just finished my #34/#36 amp, and I consider mounting Lar/Mar PPIMV. I've one question about cables on pot. In metroamp wiki,I can read, that if you are mounting PPIMV, you have to use RG174/U as your cable for mod. Is this really necessary to use this type of cable? I've asked for this in all electronics stores in my city - they say, that they don't have it in stock.Code: Select all
http://metroamp.com/wiki/index.php/Lar/Mar_PPI-MV
Regards
Regards
DIY JCM800 2203, mod #34/#36
- syscokid
- Senior Member
- Posts: 619
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 2:25 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: Groovy Beach, CA.
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
Where are you located?djseban wrote:... you have to use RG174/U as your cable for mod. Is this really necessary to use this type of cable? I've asked for this in all electronics stores in my city - they say, that they don't have it in stock.
"When I'm on stage and first plug in, and I feel a rush of air in my balls... That's when I know my guitar is sounding good!" -Leslie West
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:39 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
I installed the LarMar MV in my JTM45 last night and I seem to notice more gain now...is this normal?
- CoffeeTones
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1112
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 9:52 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: USA
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
There should not be more perceived gain if the LarMar is turned all the way up, unless the resistors and pot in parallel do not equal the original value of the two resistors removed from the original circuit. Turned down, yes.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1407
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:05 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
Yes it is normal, the gain increase comes from lowering the NFB via PPIMV. It should also sound looser and brighter, fizzier etccoldengray wrote:I installed the LarMar MV in my JTM45 last night and I seem to notice more gain now...is this normal?

-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:39 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
Yes, turned below Noon it gets fuzzy and loose. And definitely more gain the more the MV is used. But certainly a very usable solution. Noon or higher it really shines. Thanks for the help. Love this amp!
PS - yes when turned completely up everything is back to "normal". And loud!
PS - yes when turned completely up everything is back to "normal". And loud!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:39 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
Would increasing the 47pf PI cap help smooth the fizziness when the LarMar is engaged heavily?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1407
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:05 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
Yes, increasing it should help, but what worked best for me was removing that MV all together 

-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5056
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 1:36 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Drontheim. Norwegen
- Contact:
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
I'd rather increase NFB. try a 22k resistor in series with a 220k pot into the 16 ohms secondarycoldengray wrote:Would increasing the 47pf PI cap help smooth the fizziness when the LarMar is engaged heavily?
http://www.myspace.com/20bonesband" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.myspace.com/prostitutes" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Super 100 amps: 1202-119 & 1202-84
JTM45 RS OT JTM50 JMP50 1959/2203/34/39
http://www.myspace.com/prostitutes" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Super 100 amps: 1202-119 & 1202-84
JTM45 RS OT JTM50 JMP50 1959/2203/34/39
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:39 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
Re: The PPIMV (Post-PI-Master-Volume) thread.
It doesn't color the tone too much at 50% or higher...it's certainly a usable solution for me considering it only cost $10 in parts. I might try out a Phaez Brink attentuator.stef wrote:Yes, increasing it should help, but what worked best for me was removing that MV all together